SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1250

R.BANUMATHI, A.S.BOPANNA, HRISHIKESH ROY
Mitra Guha Builders (India) Company – Appellant
Versus
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :B.N. Patel, Romila, Sweta, Sharmila Upadhyay, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):K.M. Natraj, Akshay Amritanshu, Balraj Dewan, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

R. BANUMATHI, J.

These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 16.02.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in FAO(OS) No.6 of 2008 and FAO(OS) No.7 of 2008 in and by which the Division Bench of the High Court has set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and also of the learned Arbitrator by holding that the levy of liquidated damages is an “excepted matter” under Clause 2 read with Clause 25 of the contract and the same is not arbitrable.

2. Brief facts which led to filing of these appeals are as follows:-

Appellant-M/s. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Company and the respondent-Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) entered into a contract on 05.01.1996 bearing No.DHL/Civil/NOIDA/6/94 for construction of Multi-storeyed Residential flats 28 Nos. ‘C’ type guest house multipurpose hall service block underground water tank etc. and other work for ONGC. The appellant-claimant raised certain claims which were refuted by the respondent and thus, the claimant invoked the arbitration Clause 25 of the General Conditions of the contract vide letter dated 07.09.2001

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top