Radha Bai vs Ram Narayan - 2019 Supreme(SC) 1289

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(SC) 1289

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Radha Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ram Narayan – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Akshat Shrivastava, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Manoj Prasad, Yogesh Tiwari, Vinod Mehta, Vikrant Singh Bais, Ravi Kumar Dwivedi, Ajay Kumar Srivastava, Rajesh Pandey, Tanuja manjari Patra, Shweta Mulchandan, Aswathi M.K., Mahesh Pandey, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.

1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 12th February, 2007 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (for short, ‘the High Court’) in Second Appeal No.84 of 2002, whereby the appeal filed by the respondents-original defendant Nos. 1 to 4 was allowed and the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court dismissing the suit filed by the appellant, came to be confirmed.

2. The parties are related as under:

Sukhdeo (Sahdeo)

Expired in 1965

Janakram

Son of Sukhdeo

Expired in 1982

Pilaram

Son of Sukhdeo

Expired in 1967

Sonu

Defendant No. 4

Expired in 2016

Saheblal

Expired in 1957

Laxmibai

Expired in 1984 (Wife)

Radha Bai

Plaintiff (Daughter)

Ram Narayan

Defendant No. 1

Jaya Narayan

Defendant No. 2

Rohit Kumar

Defendant No. 3

3. The appellant filed suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Class – First, Shakti – District Bilaspur being Civil Suit No.31/A of 1985 asserting that the land situated in Village Barra, Tehsil Shakti, more particularly described in Schedule A of the plaint, was owned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(SC) 1289

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARIRadha Bai – AppellantVersusRam Narayan – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Radha Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ram Narayan – Respondent