D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI
Idol of Sri Renganathaswamy Represented by its Executive Officer, Joint Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Thoppulan Chettiar, Ramanuja Koodam Anandhana Trust, Rep. by its Managing Trustee – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.
1. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 1 December 2016 of a Single Judge of the Madurai Bench of High Court of Judicature at Madras. The High Court dismissed the appellant‘s second appeal and upheld the judgment dated 31 August 2005 of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli and the decree dated 10 November 2004 of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, permitting the first respondent to sell a portion of the suit property to the fourth respondent.
2. The first respondent is a trust represented by its Managing Trustee. The second and third respondents are members of the first respondent. The suit property was originally purchased on 2 June 1887 by Thoppulan Chettiar. On a portion of the property, he constructed a ‘Stone Mandapam’ for the deity of Sri Renganathaswamy. During the Hindu festival months, he used to invite the deity of Sri Renganathaswamy and receive its blessings. In addition, Thoppulan Chettiar also conducted other charitable activities at the suit property for the benefit of the devotees, namely supplying drinking water and millet porridge for three days during the Gajendra Moksham and Eighteen Padi
Menakuru Dasaratharami Reddi v Duddukuru Subba Rao
Mahant Ram Saroop Dasji v S P Sahi
M J Thulasiraman v Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Admn
Commr, Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments v Narayana Ayyangar
K S Soundararajan v Commr of Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.