SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 301

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Linde India Ltd. (Formerly BOC India Ltd) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :G. N. Reddy, Guntur Prabhakar, Advocates
For the Respondent:Annam D. N. Rao, M/S. Khaitan & Co., Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

Leave granted.

2. The short point of law that arises in the present appeals is whether "Medical Oxygen IP" and "Nitrous Oxide IP" are taxable under Entry 88 of Schedule IV of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2005 [2005 Act.] or as "unclassified goods" under Schedule V. The classification of the two products determines the rate of tax to be levied on them 4%/5% [5% substituted for the figure 4% by Act 11 of 2012 dated 20 April 2012.] under Entry 88 or 12.5%/14% [14.5% substituted for the figure 12.5% by Act 9 of 2010 dated 20 April 2010.] under Schedule V.

3. The facts in the appeals before this Court being similar, we proceed to elucidate the factual context of the lead appeal.

4. The respondent Linde India Ltd, is a registered company under the 2005 Act and is an assessee on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Gajuwaka and Dwarakanagar Circle. The respondent is engaged in the manufacturing and trading of industrial gases as well as Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP. On 12 December 2005, the Commercial Tax Officer communicat


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top