SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 328

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ.
Kanwal Tanuj – Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Bihar & Ors. – Respondent(s)
Criminal Appeal No. 414 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No. 9876 of 2018)
Decided on : 24-04-2020

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mridula Ray Bharadwaj Advocate
For the Respondent:Arvind Kumar Sharma, Niranjana Singh Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
CBI will have jurisdiction to lodge FIR in a case of hatching conspiracy to defraud a Government undertaking in its registered office at Delhi and siphoning its fund notwithstanding that co-accused resides outside Delhi.

Headnote:

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 5 and 6 r/w notification dated 19.2.1996 - Exercise of jurisdiction of CBI in States - Consent of concerned State - Instantly project funded by Central Government undertaken by BRBCL, a Government undertaking having registered office in the Union Territory of Delhi - Offence of defrauding the undertaking (BRBCL) and siphoning of its funds allegedly committed at its registered office - FIR not limited to an offence of manipulation of official records of the State of Bihar as such - It is about the means used by different actors who were party to the conspiracy in defrauding the Government of India undertaking (BRBCL) and siphoning of its funds - State of Bihar police not having jurisdiction to investigate the offence committed at Delhi - Consent of State of Bihar not required - Even otherwise State has granted general consent vide notification dated 19.2.1996 - Proviso in the notification cannot be the basis to disempower the special police force/DSPE (CBI) from registering the offence committed at Delhi to defraud the Government of India undertaking (BRBCL) and siphoning of its funds. (Para 18, 19, 20, 22, 24)

Facts of the case:

The writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing of first information report (FIR) being R.C. A.C.-I, 2018A 0002 dated 21.2.2018 registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was rejected by the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

CBI had jurisdiction to lodge the FIR and conduct investigation.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal emanates from the judgment and order dated 17.9.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna (for short, "the High Court") in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case (CWJC) No. 879/2018, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing of first information report (FIR) being R.C. A.C.-I, 2018A 0002 dated 21.2.2018 registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short, "the CBI") under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code (for short," the IPC") read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, "the PC Act") came to be rejected.

3. The principal ground canvassed by the appellant before the High Court was that he being an officer of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) employed in connection with the affairs of the Government of Bihar as District Magistrate at Aurangabad District (State of Bihar) could not be subjected to investigation by the CBI without the prior consent of the State.

4. The appellant has been named as an accused alongwith one Shri C. Sivakumar, CEO, Bhartiya Rail Bijli Company Limited (for short, "BRBCL"), Nabinagar, District Aurangabad, Bihar on the basis of FIR registered by the CBI pursuant to information received from a reliable source alleging as follows: -

    "A reliable source information has been received that Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited (BRBCL), a subsidiary of NTPC Ltd. is constructing four units of 250 MW at Nabinagar in Aurangabad District (Bihar). The joint venture project has been developed by Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited (BRBCL) with NTPC having 74 percent share, while the Ministry of Railways with the remaining 26 percent. Indian Railways would get 90 percent and the state of Bihar would get ten percent of the power generated from BRBCL's plants. The construction work of BRBCL was proposed in the 2005-06 Union Budget and the Central Govt. approved the company in February 2007 but work on the plant was delayed due to land acquisition problems at Nabinagar. Actual work on BRBCL power plants started in 2008-09. The four units of BRBCL plant are proposed to be constructed on around 1,500 acres of land at Nabinagar and all of them are to be completed at a revised cost of around Rs.8,100 crore.

    2. Information further revealed that large scale corruption and siphoning of government funds has taken place in the land acquisition for the plant of Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited (BRBCL) by the BRBCL officials in criminate connivance with Local District Administration. A specific instance has been formed by source in this regard pertaining to acquisition of tL.57 acre land of Khata No. 12, plot No.1, of Mauja Kajrine for the Thermal Power Project at Nabinagar in the District of Aurangabad (Bihar). The proposal to acquire land has already been approved by the State Government of Bihar along with the compensation amount payable to the owner of the acquired lands.

    3. Information also revealed that initially vide letter No.452, dated 22.06.2015, Circle Officer, Nabinagar informed Chief Executive Officer, BRBCL, Nabinagar that there was no claimant for land 7.09 acre pertaining to Khata No. 12, plot No.1 of Mauja Kajrine. In this regard BRBCL issued a letter to Circle Officer, Nabinagar on 15.01.2016 that company had no objection if aforesaid left out land was transferred to company (BRBCL).

    4. It has been further revealed by a source that Shri C. Shiv Kumar, CEO, BRBCL, Nabinagar entered into a criminal conspiracy with Shri Kanwal Tanuj, District Magistrate, Aurangabad District (Bihar), other unknown officers/officials of BRBCL, local District Administration and Shri Gopal prasad singh (now deceased). In furtherance of the said criminal conspiracy, Shri Kanwal Tanuj, District Magistrate, Aurangabad District (Bihar) got false documents of Khata No. 12, plot No.1 of Mauja Kajrine prepared in respect of one shri Gopal prasad singh (now deceased) s/o Late Kesho Prasad


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top