SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 330

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Sujata Kohli – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, High Court of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Sunil Fernandes, , Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Gautam Narayan, Chirag M. Shroff, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.

PRELIMINARY AND BRIEF OUTLINE

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.08.2018 as passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in W.P. (C) No. 3157 of 2015, whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant, a member of Delhi Higher Judicial Service[‘DHJS’ for short.], seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of Rule 27 of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Rules of 1970’] and the Full Court resolutions dated 28.04.2009, 15.01.2010 and 27.01.2011[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the impugned resolutions’.] concerning the criteria for appointment of a member of higher judicial service to the post of District Judge and Sessions Judge or its equivalent.

3. While passing the order impugned, the High Court upheld the gradual implementation of the eligibility criteria for promotion to the post of District and Sessions Judge or equivalent with reference to the gradings in the Annual Confidential Reports[‘ACR’ or ‘ACRs’ for s


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top