SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 375

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
KAVITA KANWAR – Appellant
Versus
PAMELA MEHTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Kamini Jaiswal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sarvesh Singh, Arjun Harkauli, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.-

INTRODUCTION WITH BRIEF OUTLINE

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.06.2014 in FAO No. 36 of 2010, whereby the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi has dismissed the appeal preferred by the present appellant and has affirmed the judgment and order dated 23.11.2009 as passed by the Additional District Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Probate Case No. 465 of 2006, resulting in rejection of the appellant's prayer for grant of probate in relation to the Will dated 20.05.2003, said to have been executed by the mother of the contesting parties [Hereinafter also referred to as 'the contested Will' or 'the Will in question' or the 'document in question'.].

2. The prayer of the appellant for grant of probate in relation to the Will in question has been declined concurrently by the Trial Court and by the High Court essentially after finding several unexplained suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will in question. Being aggrieved, the petitioner-appellant, who was appointed as the executor of th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top