SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1745

UDAY UMESH LALIT, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
B. K. Pavitra – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajeev Dhavan, Adv., Kumar Parimal, Adv., Smarhar Singh, Adv., Siddhi Padia, Adv., Basava Prabhu Patil, Adv., Devadatt Kamat, Adv., V.N. Raghupathy, Adv., Rachitha Herimath, Adv., Chinmay Deshpande, Adv., Parikshit P Angadi, Adv., Indira Jaising, Adv., Anuj Saxena, Adv., Prakash Sharma, Adv., Prakrati Raj, Adv., Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv., V. Lakshminarayana, Adv., Dinesh K Garg, Adv., Abhishek Garg, Adv., Dhananjay Garg, Adv., Deepak Mishra, Adv., Puneet Jain, Adv., Christi Jain, Adv., Harsh Jain, Adv., Abhinav Deshwal, Adv., K.S. Chauhan, Adv., Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv., Ravi Prakash, Adv., Chand Kiran, Adv., S.P. Singh, Adv., Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Adv., Dharm Singh, Adv., Nanda Kumar K B, Adv., Suraj Kaushik, Adv., Sarbendra Kumar, Adv., Mohd Naved, Adv., Nehmat Kaur, Adv., Joseph Aristotle S, Adv., Priya Aristotle, Adv., Shiva P, Adv., R. Balasubramanian, Adv., Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv., B.V. Balaram Das, Adv., S.K. Kulkarni, Adv., M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv., Ankur S Kulkarni, Adv., Shirish K Deshpande, Adv., Sharan G Patil, Adv., Mohit Gautam, Adv., Naveen R Nath, Adv., Rahul Jain, Adv., Siddharth Agarwal, Adv., B.V. Balram Das, Adv., Devasa & Co, Adv., Satpal Singh, Adv., S.N. Bhat, Adv., Pulkit Tare, Adv., Anagha S Desai, Adv., E.C. Vidya Sagar, Adv., Vipin Gupta, Adv., Sudhir Nagar, Adv., Kabir Dixit, Adv.

ORDER

1. Ia No.36981/2019 in W.P.(C) No.764/2018

    On 12.10.2018, following order was passed by this Court:

    "1. After the judgment was rendered by this Court in B.K. Pavitra & Others v. Union of India & Others , (2017) 4 SCC 620, contempt petitions were filed submitting inter alia that the directions issued in the judgment were not followed. Those contempt petitions were disposed of by order dated 20.03.2018 making certain observations.

    2. According to the contempt petitioners, the directions issued by this Court were still not being followed in its entirety and as such they had prayed for consequential reliefs by filing Miscellaneous Applications.

    3. The Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the basis of Reservation (to the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act, 2017 came into force on 23.06.2018.

    4. On 28.6.2018, stand was taken by the State in affidavit filed in this Court that with the above enactment, the basis or the foundation of the judgment stood taken away. Later, independent writ petitions were filed challenging the validity of the aforesaid legislation which are still pending consideration by this Court.

    5. While the mat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top