SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 2234

MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, AJAY RASTOGI
Hooghly Mills Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mohan M. Shantanagoudar. J. - Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises out of judgment dated 24.8.2017 of the Calcutta High Court allowing the 2 nd Respondent's Criminal Revision Petition against order dated 6.9.2010 of the Judicial Magistrate, Alipore and order dated 21.12.2012 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Alipore.

3. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows: The appellant is an 'existing' company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 1956 Act'), which entered into agreement for sale dated 26.4.2008 for purchase of a flat situated on the 3 rd Floor, of Plot-D in Sreekunj, 13, Gurusaday Road, Police Station-Karaya, Kolkata-700019 (hereinafter 'disputed property') with the legal heirs of one late Mr. Arun Kumar Bajoria (hereinafter 'vendors'). Per the terms of the agreement, the vendors would execute and register the deed of conveyance in favour of the appellant upon payment of the entire sale consideration of Rs. 2,02,26,000/-. However in the interim, under Clause 6 of the agreement, the appellant company would be put into possession of the property subject to payment of monthly rent of Rs. 84,275/-. This agreement is not dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top