JUDGMENT

Saran, J. -- 1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. Brief facts of this case, relevant for the purpose of the present appeals, are that the complainant (Shilpika Kalra) and her husband (Manish Kalra) got married on 28.7.2007. The marriage took place in Delhi, but thereafter, they were living together in Mumbai, where both were working. Admittedly, the two of them started living separately since 10.6.2009. Thereafter, on 24.7.2009, the husband-Manish Kalra filed a divorce petition before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai. The said divorce petition is still pending.

4. Then, after a gap of nearly three and a half years, on 28.1.2013, the wife-Shilpika Kalra filed a complaint in Delhi seeking registration of First Information Report (for short ‘FIR’) against Manish Kalra (husband), Kamlesh Kalra (mother-in-law), Avnish Kalra (brother-in-law) and Suman Kalra (sister-in-law), along with a list of stridhan articles, alleging that the said articles were in possession of all the accused. Then, on 29.10.2014, the police registered an FIR under sections 406 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) against all the accused as mentioned above. The said FIR reads as f