SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1352

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ASHOK BHAN, DEVINDER KUMAR JAIN, JJ.
Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal - Appellants
Versus
Mandideep Eng. & Pkg. Ind. Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
Civil Appeal No.2196 of 2001
Decided on : 12-04-2006

Deductions under Sections 80-HH and 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be claimed on the gross total income independently, as established by the acceptance of this view in judgments of different High Courts.

Headnote:

Income Tax Act - Sections 80-HH and 80-I - Interpretation of provisions

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the interpretation of whether a new industrial unit can claim deductions under both Sections 80-HH and 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 independently or if the deduction under Section 80-I can be taken on the reduced balance after taking into account the benefit taken under Section 80-HH.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the department had accepted the view taken in judgments of different High Courts, which held that deductions could be claimed under both Sections 80-HH and 80-I on the gross total income independently. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal, stating that the department cannot take a contrary view in the present case involving the same point.

Issues: Interpretation of Sections 80-HH and 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the department had accepted the view taken in judgments of different High Courts, which held that deductions could be claimed under both Sections 80-HH and 80-I on the gross total income independently.

Final Decision: The Civil Appeal was dismissed with no costs.

ORDER :

Ashok Bhan, J.

The point involved in the present case is: whether Sections 80-HH and 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are independent of each other and therefore a new industrial unit can claim deductions under both the sections on the gross total income independently or that deduction under Section 80-I can be taken on the reduced balance after taking into account the benefit taken under Section 80-HH.

2. The Madhya Pradesh High Court in J.P. Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Income Tax, Jabalpur 229 ITR 123 took the view that both the sections are independent and, therefore, the deductions could be claimed both under Sections 80-HH and 80-I on the gross total. Against this judgment a Special Leave Petition was filed in this Court which was dismissed on the ground of delay on 21.07.2000 [see 245 ITR 71 (St.)].

3. The decision in J.P. Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. (supra) was followed by the same High Court in the case of Commissioner Income Tax v. Alpine Solvex (P) Ltd. in ITA No. 92 of 1999 decided on May 2, 2000. Special Leave Petition against this decision was dismissed by this Court on 12.01.2001 (see 247 ITR 36 (St.)).

4. This view has been followed repeatedly by different High Courts in a number of cases against which no Special leave Petitions were filed meaning thereby that the department has accepted the view taken in these judgments. See Commissioner Income Tax v. Nima Specific Family Trust 248 ITR 29 (Bom.); Commissioner Income Tax v. Chokshi Contacts P. Ltd. 251 ITR 587 (Raj.); Commissioner Income Tax v. Amod Stamping 274 ITR 176(Guj.); Commissioner Income Tax v. Mittal Appliances P. Ltd. 270 ITR 65 (MP); Commissioner Income Tax v. Rochiram & Sons 271 ITR 444 (Raj.); Commissioner Income Tax v. Prakash Chandra Basant Kumar 276 ITR 664 (MP); Commissioner Income Tax v. SB Oil Industries 274 ITR 495 (P&H); Commissioner Income Tax v. M/.s SKG Engineering Pvt. Ltd. 119 (2005) DLT 673; and Commissioner Income Tax v. Lucky Laboratories 200 CTR 305 (All.).

5. Since the special leave petitions filed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court have been dismissed and the department has not filed the special leave petitions against the judgments of different High Courts following the view taken by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, we do not find any merit in this appeal. The department having accepted the view taken in those judgments cannot be permitted to take a contrary view in the present case involving the same point. Accordingly, Civil Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top