SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 2515

ALTAMAS KABIR, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.CHELAMESWAR
Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties :- K.K. Venugopal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rukhsana Choudhury, Col. Edwin Jesudas, Ankur Talwar, S. Ravi Shankar, Pravin Satale, Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Manoj Goel, Wajeeh Shafiq, Gopal Verma, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Shuvodeep Roy, Vishwajit Singh, Harinder Mohan Singh, Naushad Ahmad Khan, Mehbubul Hassan L., Aftab Ali Khan, Dushyant Singh, R. Nedumaran, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, S. Ravi Shankar, Ankur Mittal, Pranav Kumar Jha, Sanjay R. Hegde, Tenzin Tsering, S. Nithin, Anil Kumar Mishra - I, Hari Shankar K., Vikash Singh Jangra, Ramesh Babu M.R., N. Rajaraman, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, S.K. Mendiratta, Ms. Poli Kaiki, Vasav V., Rakesh K. Sharma, Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Jogy Scaria, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, M/s. Lawyer's Knit & Co., Ramesh N. Keswani, Ram Lal Roy, M/s. Keswai & Co., Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Altmas Kabir, J. (Surinder Singh Nijjar agreeing, Chelameswar, J. dissenting)

1. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 532 of 2008 was filed by Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam and Colonel Edwin Jesudoss (Retd.), challenging the constitutional validity of the amendment of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, hereinafter referred to as the "Election Symbols Order, 1968", vide Notification No. O.N. 56/2000/Jud-III dated 1st December, 2000, substituting Clause 6 with 6A(i) and (ii) and Clause 6B therein. The same was taken up for final hearing along with several other Writ Petitions on account of the common issue involved therein. The common grievance in all these writ petitions is with regard to the amendment which mandates that in order to be recognised as a State party in the State, it would have to secure not less than 6% of the total valid votes polled in the State and should also have returned at least 2 members to the Legislative Assembly of the State.

2. The grievance of the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam is that it had been refused recognition as a State party by the Election Commission of India, although, it secured 8.33% of the valid votes in the Asse

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                        whatsapp-icon Back to top