SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1286

B.S.CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA
Sanjay Ashok Powar – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Ashok Powar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- P. Vinay Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:- Asha G. Nair, Advocate.

ORDER :

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 29.3.2007 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Crl. A. No. 547 of 2003, by way of which it has modified the judgment and order of the Sessions Court, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2002 dated 11.3.2003, by way of which the appellant stood convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 34 and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as `the IPC') along with others, converting the conviction under Sections 304-II read with 34 IPC and awarded the sentence of 10 years. However, it has set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 364 IPC. The trial court had awarded the sentence under Sections 302 r/w 34 IPC to suffer life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default to suffer further RI for one year; and under Section 364 sentence for life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default to suffer RI for one year. Both the sentences for life imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.

2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that:

    A. Parshuram Kashinath Chavan (A.1) doubted the character of his wife and had a suspicion

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top