Mohammad Salimullah vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 186

S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Mohammad Salimullah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Ms. Cheryl Dsouza, Adv. Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sneha Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Fazal Abdali, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR
For the Respondents/Applicants: Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh, AOR Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, AOR Mr. Somiran Sharma, AOR Mr. Suvidutt M.S., AOR Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, AOR Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Ms. Madhvi Divan, ASG Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, AOR Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ld. SG Ms. Madhvi Diwan, Ld. ASG Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makkar, AOR Mr. Kanu Agrawal, AOR Ms. Shradha Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Ms./Mr. Advnidhi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Mohit Paul, AOR Ms. Sunaina Phul, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, AAG, Haryana Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Upadhyaya, Adv. Mr. Gautam Jha, AOR Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Mr. Surendranath, Sr. Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandran KR, Adv. Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, AOR Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. P.V. Surendranath, Sr. Adv. Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, AOR Mr. Subhas Chandran, Adv. Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. Sawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli, Adv. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Mr. Ankit Roy, Adv. Ms. Nimisha Menon, Adv. Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Adv. Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR Mr. Parth Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajeev K. Panday, Adv. Mr. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Maheshwaranand Roy, AOR Mr. P. Srinivasan, Adv. Mr. Chandra Uday Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Adv. Mr. N K Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, AOR Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, AOR Mr. Umesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Prateek Som, Adv. Mr. Jyoti Mishra, Adv. Mr. Alok Pandey, Adv.

ORDER :

1. Pending disposal of their main writ petition praying for the issue of an appropriate writ directing the respondents to provide basic human amenities to the members of the Rohingya Community, who have taken refuge in India, the petitioners who claim to have registered themselves as refugees with the United Nations High Commission for refugees, have come up with the present interlocutory application seeking (i) the release of the detained Rohingya refugees; and (ii) a direction to the Union of India not to deport the Rohingya refugees who have been detained in the subjail in Jammu.

2. We have heard Sh. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel and Sh. Colin Gonsalves, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicants/writ petitioners, Sh. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India, Sh. Harish Salve, learned senior counsel appearing for the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir, Sh. Vikas Singh and Sh. Mahesh Jethmalani, learned senior counsel appearing for persons who seek to implead/intervene in the matter.

3. Sh. Chandra Uday Singh, learned senior counsel representing the Special Rapporteur appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council also attem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 186

S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIANMohammad Salimullah – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Mohammad Salimullah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent