SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 293

S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Ramachnadrapura Math – Appellant
Versus
Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. K.G. Raghavan, Sr. Adv. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ejaz Maqbool, Shailesh Madiyal, Ms. Rooh e Hina Dua, Avishkar Singhvi, Cheitanya Madan, Ms. Madhuri, Panigrahi, Sudhanshu, Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Pai Amit, Saurabh Agrawal, Ms. Komal Mundhra, Rahat Bansal, Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Ms. Bhavana Duhoon, Ms. Ranu Purohit, Geet Ranjan Ahuja, Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Nikhil Goel, AAG Shubhranshu Padhi, Ashish Yadav, Rakshit Jain, Vishal Banshal, Advocates
For the Respondent(s)/ Applicant(s):Mayank Pandey, Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Nikhil Goel, AAG Shubhranshu Padhi, Ashish Yadav, Rakshit Jain, Vishal Banshal, Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Suraj Kaushik, Dharm Singh, For M/s Nuli & Nuli, J. Sai Deepak, Suvidutt M.S., Mrs. Anu B., Vibhor Ahlawat, Abhishek Avadani, Avinash Sharma, Yogesh Kumar, Abhijeet Singh, Ms. Anannya Ghosh, Applicant(s)-in-person, Advocates

ORDER :

1. The petitioners are before this Court claiming to be aggrieved by the order dated 10.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in W.P. No.30609/2008 and connected petitions. The issue raised in the petitions was with regard to the status of ‘Gokarna Mahabaleshwara Temple’. A Notification dated 30.04.2003/01.05.2003 was issued under Section 23 of the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 notifying the temples mentioned therein as coming within the purview of the Act. In the said notification, the ‘Gokarna Mahabaleshwara Temple’ was also included at Serial No.92. The said position remained so until the petitioners herein claiming to be aggrieved by such notification made a representation seeking that the temple be deleted from the notification since according to them it was attached to the petitioners’ ‘Mutt’ and was therefore not covered by the Act in view of Section 1(4) of the Act, 1997. Pursuant thereto the official respondents through the Government Order dated 12.08.2008 ordered the deletion of ‘Shri Mahabaleshwara Temple’, Gokarna from the list of notified temples published on 30.04.2003. The Deputy Commissioner was accordingl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top