SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, M.R. Shah, JJ.
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Another - Appellant
Versus
Smt Dinavahi Lakshmi Kameswari - Respondent
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 399 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) No 12553 of 2020)
Date : 08-02-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 226, 21 , 300A , 136 and 162 - Andhra Pradesh Financial Code - Article 72 - Own revenue consisting of tax revenue - Deferment of the salaries and pensions - States’ own revenue consisting of tax revenue and non-tax revenue have shown a precipitous decline first quarter as compared receipts - States’ own revenue have not shown any appreciable improvement in the month decline is to an extent of 49% amounting crores for first - Economic consequences of lock down, cessation of revenue inflows and extra burden imposed on State’s resources to contain epidemic & to provide relief to people affected/likely to be affected, hereby orders for deferment of Salaries/Wages/Remuneration/Honorarium/Pensions on gross basis, as per following pattern – Held, Payment of deferred portions of salaries and pensions is unexceptionable - Salaries are due to employees of State for services rendered. Salaries in other words constitute rightful entitlement of employees and are payable in accordance with law - It is well settled that payment of pension is for years of past service rendered by the pensioners to State - Pensions are a matter of a rightful entitlement recognised by applicable rules and regulations which govern service of employees of State - State Government has complied with directions of this Court for payment of outstanding dues in two tranches – Court are of the view that rate of 12% per annum which has been fixed by High Court should be suitably scaled down - While learned counsel for respondents submits that award of interest was on account of action of Government which was contrary to law – Court are of the view that payment of interest cannot be used as a means to penalize the State Government – Court order and direct that in substitution of interest rate of 12% per annum which has been awarded by High Court - Government of Andhra Pradesh shall pay simple interest computed at rate of 6% per annum on account of deferred salaries and pensions within a period of thirty days from today shall be confined to categories - Court clarify that interest shall be paid to all pensioners of State at rate of 6% per annum on the deferred portion, for period of delay - Having regard to prevailing bank interest - Appeal is disposed of.
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises from a judgment and order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 11 August 2020. The State of Andhra Pradesh issued GOMs No. 26 on 31 March 2020 and GOMs No. 37 on 26 April 2020. The backdrop for the orders was the outbreak of Covid-19 and the financial crises which had resulted as a consequence. The revenues of the State of Andhra Pradesh were impacted by the onset of the pandemic. The financial position of the State finds reference in the judgment of the High Court, which has been extracted below:
The above extract in the judgment of the High Court is based on the submissions of the State.
3. By GOMs No. 26 of 31 March 2020, the State Government determined that it was necessary, as an urgent measure, to provide for a deferment of the salaries and pensions which it was obligated to pay. Consequently, paragraph 5 stipulated as follows:
(i) There shall be (100)% deferment in respect of Hon’ble C.M./Hon’ble Ministers/Hon’ble M.L.As/Hon’ble M.L.Cs, Chairperson & Members of all Corporations, elected representatives of all Local Bodies & people holding equivalent posts, as per the orders issued from time to time.
(ii) There shall be (60)% deferment in respect of All India Service Officers viz., IAS, IPS and IFS;
(iii) There shall be (50)% deferment in respect of all other Government employees, including work-charged employees & persons engaged under the category of direct individuals professions & through rd party, except Class-IV Employees;
(iv) There shall be (10)% deferment in respect of Class-IV, Out-sourcing, Contract and the Village & Ward Secretariat employees;
(v) The deferment mentioned in respect of Para 5(i), (ii), (iii) & (iv) supra shall be made applicable mutatismutandisin respect of the retired employees in the respective categories.
(vi) The above deferment shall be equally applicable to the serving & retired employees of all PSUs/Government aided Institutes/Organizations/Universities/Societies/Autonomous bodies/Semi autonomous bodies, etc. in respect of their Salaries/Wages / Honorarium / Pensions.”
4. It is also provided that the above orders would come into force in respect of the salary, wages, remuneration and pensions for the month of March 2020, payable in April 2020 and would continue to remain in force until further orders.
5. On 4 April 2020, there was a modification by the State Government in terms of GOMs No.27 which provided for the payment of full salary to the employees of three departments, namely, (i) medical and health department;
(ii) police department; and (iii) sanitation workers working in rural local bodies or urban local bodies, such as Nagar Panchayats, Municipalities and Municipal Corporations.
6. On 26 April 2020, GOMs No.37 provided for a further modification under which the Government, having noticed the hardships which were being faced by the pensioners, directed the payment of full pension to all categories of pensioners.
7. A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed before the High Court by a former District and
Salary for government employees is a property right protected under the Constitution, and cannot be deferred by executive orders without legislative authority.
Teachers are entitled to be paid salary from the date of creation of the post. An executive order cannot override express statutory provisions. The right to livelihood, including the right to receive....
The court established that under the Haryana Civil Services (Revised Pension) Rules, 2009, there is no entitlement to interest on delayed pension payments.
Fixing of a cut-off date for granting of benefits is well within the powers of Government as long as the reasons therefor are not arbitrary and are based on some rational consideration.
The court affirmed that dearness allowance for pensioners is a statutory right under Rule 20A and cannot be altered by administrative orders, emphasizing the finality of judicial decisions.
Employees are entitled to interest on delayed payment of salaries and pensions, as it is their rightful entitlement and a matter of right recognized by the Constitution and applicable rules and regul....
Financial constraint can justify fixing a cut-off date for payment of revised pension, and the court should consider the State's justification for policy decisions based on financial constraints.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.