CHANDAN BANERJEE vs KRISHNA PROSAD GHOSH

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 567

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLI
CHANDAN BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA PROSAD GHOSH – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty, Adv Mr. Achinta Bannerjee, Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Barua, Adv. Mr. Sujoy Mondal, Adv. Ms. Reshmi Rea Sinha, AOR Mr. Sukesh Ghosh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J

Index

A. Facts................................................................................................................... 2

B. Submissions of parties..................................................................................... 9

C. Legal Position .................................................................................................. 12

D. Analysis ........................................................................................................... 22

E. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 29

1. The appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta dated 25 January 2019. The Division Bench upheld a circular dated 3 July 2012 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation¹[“KMC”] which prescribed separate conditions for diploma and degree holder Sub-Assistant Engineers²[“SAE”] for supernumerary appointments as Assistant Engineers³[“AE”]. The gradation list dated 5 July 2012 prepared in pursuance of the impugned circular h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 567

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLICHANDAN BANERJEE – AppellantVersusKRISHNA PROSAD GHOSH – Respondent

Cases Referred (14)

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLI
CHANDAN BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA PROSAD GHOSH – Respondent