SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hemant Gupta, V. Ramasubramanian, JJ.
Prabhagiya Van Adhikari Awadh Van Prabhag – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Bhardwaj (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 7017 of 2009
Decided On : 05-10-2021
U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 4, 5 and 117 - Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4 and 20 - Consolidation Act - Section 48 - Vesting of certain lands and other local authorities - Vesting of estates in the State - Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 was published in U.P. Gazette effect that an area of 162 acres in Village shall not vest with - Commencement of this Act, State Government may, by notification, declare that, as from a date to be specified, all estates situate in Uttar Pradesh shall vest in State and as from beginning of the date so specified such estates shall stand transferred to and vest, except as hereinafter provided, in State free from all encumbrances - lawful for State Government, if it so considers necessary, to issue, from time to time, notification referred to in sub-section (1) in respect only of such area or areas as may be specified and all provisions of sub-section (1) shall be applicable to and in case of every such notification – Held, Court had referred to the objections filed by lessees under Consolidation Act and also objections by Forest Department - It was held by the High Court that since no objections were filed by Forest Department earlier objections would be barred by Section 49 of the Consolidation Act – Court find that such finding recorded by High Court is clearly erroneous - Land vests in the Forest Department by virtue of notification published under a statute - It was the lessee who had to assert title on forest land by virtue of an agreement in writing by a competent authority but no such agreement in writing has been produced - Lessee would not be entitled to any right only on the basis of an entry in revenue record - Appeal is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad on 30.11.2005 whereby the writ petition filed by the respondents1[For short, the ‘lessees’] was allowed.
2. The High Court vide the impugned order has set aside the order dated 08.07.2004 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow, wherein, the revenue entry of Khasra Nos. 1576 and 1738 was ordered to be corrected in the name of Department of Forest and the claim of rival claimants were set aside.
3. A notification dated 11.10.1952 under Section 4 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 19502[For short, the ‘Abolition Act’] was published in U.P. Gazette dated 18.10.1952 to the effect that an area of 162 acres in Village Kasmandi Khurd shall not vest with the Gaon Samaj. The relevant extract of the notification reads thus:
1. All land, whether cultivable or otherwise except land for the time being comprised in any holding or grove, and
2. All the forest within the village boundaries.
Situate in a circle, which have vested in the state under the said Act, shall, subject to the exceptions shown in Schedules land I and II hereto, vest in the Gaon Samaj established for the Circle.
Schedule I
Particulars of uncultivated land and the extent to which they shall not vest in Gaon Samajs
| District | Tahsil | Pargana | Village | Extent to which the uncultivated land (to be demarcated shall not vest) |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Lucknow | Lucknow | Bijnor | 1. xxx xxx xxx | xxx xxx xxx |
| 19. Kasmandi Khurd | 162 |
4. The provisions of the Abolition Act, as are relevant for the purpose of the present appeal, read thus: -
(2) It shall be lawful for the State Government, if it so considers necessary, to issue, from time to time, the notification referred to in sub-section (1) in respect only of such area or areas as may be specified and all the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be applicable to and in the case of every such notification.
5. Notification to be published in the Gazette. - The notification referred to in Section 4 shall be published in the Gazette and such publication shall be conclusive proof of the due publication thereof.
6. Consequences of the vesting of an estate in the State. -When the notification under Section 4 has been published in the Gazette, then, notwithstanding anything contained in any contract or document or in any other law for the time being in force and save as otherwise provided in this Act, the consequences as hereinafter set forth shall, from the beginning of the date of vesting, ensure in the area to which the notification relates, namely:
(a) all rights, title and interest of all the intermediaries—
(i) in every estate in such area including land (cultivable or barren), groveland, forests whether within or outside village boundaries, trees (other than trees in village abadi, holding or grove), fisheries, tanks, ponds, water channels, ferries, pathways, abadi sites, hats, bazars and melas [other than hats, bazars and melas held upon land to which clauses (a) to (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 18 apply], and
(ii) in all sub-soil in such estates including right
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.