N. V. RAMANA, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER :
The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.
George Orwell, 1984
1. The present batch of Writ Petitions raise an Orwellian concern, about the alleged possibility of utilizing modern technology to hear what you hear, see what you see and to know what you do. In this context, this Court is called upon to examine an allegation of the use of such a technology, its utility, need and alleged abuse. We make it clear that our effort is to uphold the constitutional aspirations and rule of law, without allowing ourselves to be consumed in the political rhetoric. This Court has always been conscious of not entering the political thicket. However, at the same time, it has never cowered from protecting all from the abuses of fundamental rights. All that we would like to observe in this regard is a reiteration of what had already been said by this Court in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (Opinion of Justice Khanna) AIR 1973 SC 1461:
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
K.S. Puttaswamy (Privacy-9J.) v. Union of India
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Limited v. Union of India
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India
Rohit Pandey v. Union of India
Ram Jethmalani v. Union of India
Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Families Association v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.