SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 772

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, S. A. BOBDE, R. K. AGRAWAL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, A. M. SAPRE, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. ABDUL NAZEER
JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Impleaders :- Sushil Kumar Singh, Applicant-In-Person, Amit Sharma, Advocates.
For the Petitioners:- Anish Kumar Gupta, Advs.
For the Respondents:- Anip Sachthey, Anil Katiyar, Ashok Mathur, Harish Pandey, Garvesh Kabra, Aniruddha P. Mayee, (M/s Corporate Law Group), Hemantika Wahi, D.S. Mahra, Anitha Shenoy, Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, M. Shoeb Alam, Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Intervenor-In-Person, Amit Sharma, Applicant-In-Person, Varinder Kumar Sharma, (Arputham Aruna And Co), Savita Singh, Jayant Mohan, Sanjay Kapur, Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Ranjan Mukherjee, Guntur Prabhakar, T.G. Narayanan Nair, V. G. Pragasam, Jagjit Singh Chhabra. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Abhinav Mukerji, Mishra Saurabh, Manish Vashishtha, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Ruchi Kohli, Manoj K. Mishra, Gopal Singh, Tapesh Kumar Singh, Advs.

Judgement Key Points

No direct arguments in support of Aadhaar ID are made in this judgment, as the Court explicitly declines to decide the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme and remands the matter for adjudication on merits by the original Bench. (!) (!)

However, certain observations recognize legitimate State interests that align with Aadhaar's objectives, such as efficient delivery of welfare benefits and prevention of resource diversion:

  • In a social welfare state, the government has a vital interest in ensuring scarce public resources reach legitimate beneficiaries without dissipation, justifying collection of authentic data through data mining. (!)

  • State intervention for data collection is permissible if (i) supported by valid law, (ii) necessary for legitimate aims like protecting national security or public welfare, and (iii) proportionate, with data not used for extraneous purposes. (!) (!)

  • Public interest in preventing leakage of subsidies and benefits supports data regimes, balanced against individual privacy. (!)

  • Commendation to the Union Government to establish a robust data protection regime, noting a committee (chaired by Justice B.N. Srikrishna) for this purpose, implies recognition of need for structured data handling in schemes like Aadhaar. (!) (!) (!)


JUDGMENT

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.

This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are:

A. The reference

B. Decision in M P Sharma

C. Decision in Kharak Singh

D. Gopalan doctrine: fundamental rights as isolated silos

E. Cooper and Maneka: Interrelationship between rights

F. Origins of privacy

G. Natural and inalienable rights

H. Evolution of the privacy doctrine in India

I. The Indian Constitution

  • Preamble

  • Jurisprudence on dignity

  • Fundamental Rights cases

  • No waiver of Fundamental Rights

  • Privacy as intrinsic to freedom and liberty

  • Discordant Notes: (i) ADM Jabalpur

      (ii) Suresh Koushal

J. India’s commitments under International law

K. Comparative law on privacy

(i) UK decisions

(ii) US Supreme Court decisions

(iii) Constitutional right to privacy in South Africa

(iv) Constitutional right to privacy in Canada

(v) Privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Charter

(vi) Decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

L. Criticisms of the privacy doctrine

a. Thomson’s Reductionism

b. Posner’s Economic critique

c. Bork’s critique

d. Femi





























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top