SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
M.R. SHAH, SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.
Safiq Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others - Respondents
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1110 of 2017
Decided on : 16-12-2021
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Sections 158 and 159 – Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 – Section 10 – Fake claim petitions – Malady and remedy – Some of modus operandi adopted are; i) Non-road accident injury-death converted into road accident claims; ii) fraudulent implantation of vehicle; iii) false implantation of driver; iv) claimant implantation; v) multiple claims at various for a at different territorial locations for compensation out of injury/death caused arising out of same accident – Often claim applications are filed both before various MACT Tribunals as well as authorities under Employees Compensation Act, 1923; vi) fake/fabricated insurance policies; and vii) fake/fabricated income documents/medical documents for exaggerated compensation – For the purpose of earning illegal money, some actual vehicle owners and actual drivers of vehicles in connivance with advocates, submits registration certificates of their vehicles and Driver Licences in the unknown motor accident cases for filing fake petitions – Elaborate directions issued. (Paras 7.1 to 7.4)
Facts of the case:
Point in issue is with respect to filing of fake claim petitions for getting compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act as well as under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Findings of Court:
Additional Solicitor General of India to appear on behalf of the Ministry of Transport, Government of India and to assist the Court and to come out with suggestions how to curb the menace of filing false/fake claim petitions. After getting the response/suggestions, we may issue further directions to be applied pan India.
Result : Directions issued.
ORDER :
1. The issue is with respect to filing of fake claim petitions for getting compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act as well as under the Workmen Compensation Act.
2. Pursuant to our earlier order dated 05.10.2021, the Special Investigating Team (SIT) has filed a Status Report with respect to complaints filed/enquiry completed, the names of the accused, where the criminal complaints are filed and in which criminal cases the charge sheets have been filed. A separate sheet containing the names of advocates against whom the prima facie cases of cognizable offences have been found, is also filed in a separate sealed cover. It is stated in the Status Report that total 1376 cases of suspicious claims from various Districts in the State of U.P. have been received so far by the SIT. That the year-wise detail of 1376 cases received in various years thereof is as under:
| Sr.No. | Year | Cases received each year |
| 1. | 2015 | 252 |
| 2. | 2016 | 735 |
| 3. | 2017 | 128 |
| 4. | 2018 | 95 |
| 5. | 2019 | 65 |
| 6. | 2020 | 71 |
| 7. | 2021 | 30 |
| Total Cases | 1376 | |
3. It is reported that out of total 1376 cases of suspicious claims received by the SIT, after completing enquiry of 247 cases of suspicious claims till date, total 198 accused persons have been prima facie found guilty of cognizable offence and accordingly total 92 criminal cases have been registered in various districts. It is stated in the Status Report that against some of the accused persons, more than 1 criminal cases have been registered. It is stated that enquiry of remaining cases of suspicious claims is underway.
3.1 It is further stated that out of total criminal cases registered so far, investigation of 36 criminal cases have been completed and charge sheets against accused persons have been filed in 32 criminal cases and final reports in 4 criminal cases have been forwarded to the concerned Criminal Court.
3.2 It is further stated that total 92 criminal cases in various Districts have been registered till date, of which, 28 advocates have been named as accused persons in 55 cases. Charge sheets against 11 advocates in 25 cases have been forwarded to the concerned trial Court till date.
3.3 It is further stated in the Status Report that Headquarter of the SIT is situated in Lucknow. Officers/employees have to go in the districts of the entire State and sometimes have to go in other States outside the State of Uttar Pradesh for conducting enquiry/investigation proceedings as and when so warranted. It is stated that due to the outbreak of Covid-19, there was a lockdown and termination of transportation services in the State and even some of the officers/employees have been got infected, enquiry/investigation process was adversely affected. It is stated that on getting the situation normal after completion of lockdown of Corona period, full attempts are being made to start this enquiry/investigation process speedily.
3.4 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the SIT has also submitted that as the respective insurance companies are not ready to being complainants in the FIR, the investigating officer of the SIT has to become the complainant and therefore also it takes some time. It is reported that the investigating officer is also present in the Court.
4. We impress upon the investigating officer of the SIT to expedite the enquiry/investigation with respect to complaints already received from various insurance companies with respect to suspicious fake claims. We also call upon the SIT to file a further affidavit pointing out in how many cases the charge sheets have been filed; when the charge sheets have been filed (the date of filing of the charge sheets), in which Courts the charge sheets have been filed and in how many cases the charges have been framed by the concerned Magisterial Court.
5. A response affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Bar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.