2022 Supreme(SC) 80
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
M.R. SHAH, SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.
Dharmesh S. Jain & Another - Applicants
Versus
Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund - Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No. 61 of 2022 In Miscellaneous Application No. 1668 of 2021 In Special Leave Petition(C) No. 14724 of 2021
Decided On : 25-01-2022
For the Parties : Mr. Kunal Vajani, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mimani, AOR Mr. Shubhang Tandon, Adv Mr. Puneet Singh Bindra, AOR
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with court orders and rejected delay tactics employed by the applicants.
Headnote:
Recall Order - Miscellaneous Application - Not maintainable, no notice issued, non-compliance of High Court order, delay tactics - Arbitration Act, Section 34 - The court dismissed the application to recall the order dated 28.10.2021, finding that it was not maintainable and was an afterthought to avoid contempt proceedings. The court also noted the non-compliance of the High Court order and the delay tactics employed by the applicants. The court held that the order was passed after considering the apprehensions of non-compliance and delay tactics by the applicants.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants filed a miscellaneous application to recall an order dated 28.10.2021, alleging non-maintainability and lack of notice. The court found the application to be an afterthought to avoid contempt proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the application was not maintainable and was filed as an afterthought to avoid contempt proceedings. The court also noted the non-compliance of the High Court order and the delay tactics employed by the applicants.
Issues: Non-maintainability of the application, non-compliance of High Court order, delay tactics by the applicants
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the application was not maintainable and was an afterthought to avoid contempt proceedings. The court also noted the non-compliance of the High Court order and the delay tactics employed by the applicants.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the application to recall the order dated 28.10.2021.
ORDER :
1. The present miscellaneous application has been preferred by the applicants – original petitioners with a prayer to recall order dated 28.10.2021 passed in Miscellaneous Application No. 1668 of 2021.
2. Shri Shyam Divan, learned Senior Advocate has appeared on behalf of the applicants and Shri Jayant Bhushan, learned Senior Advocate has appeared on behalf of the contesting respondent.
2.1 Shri Shyam Divan, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants has made the following submissions in support of his prayer to recall order dated 28.10.2021 passed in M.A. No. 1668/2021:
(i) that Miscellaneous Application No. 1668/2021 itself was not maintainable as the same was filed in a disposed of matter;
(ii) that no notice was issued to the applicants, i.e., the original petitioners in Miscellaneous Application No. 1668/2021 and that no reply was filed on behalf of the applicants; and
(iii) in a special leave petition filed by the applicants, such a direction could not have been issued by this Court as passed vide order dated 28.10.2021. It is submitted, assuming that the applicants had not complied with the order passed by the High Court dated 08.08.2019, which was impugned before this Court, and the amount was not deposited even within the extended period of time, as extended by this Court, in that case, the only consequence would be that there was no stay of the arbitral award and that the execution proceedings are to be proceeded further. Therefore, the direction issued in order dated 28.10.2021 directing the applicants – original petitioners to deposit the amount to be deposited as per the order of the High Court positively and within the time granted by this Court and non-compliance of the same shall be treated very seriously and non-deposit of the amount as directed by the High Court in the impugned order shall be treated as non-compliance of our order also having a serious consequences, was not at all warranted and/or such an order could not have been passed.
3. We have heard Shri Shyam Divan, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants at length.
At the outset, it is required to be noted that when this Court passed order dated 28.10.2021, Shri Kunal Vajani, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the applicants – original petitioners and this Court passed order dated 28.10.2021 after hearing the learned counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants – original petitioners. A copy of M.A. No. 1668/2021 was served upon the counsel and thereafter he appeared and after hearing Shri Kunal Vajani, learned advocate who appeared on behalf of the applicants, this Court passed order dated 28.10.2021. At that time, neither any request was made to adjourn the matter so as to enable the applicants to file reply nor any objection was raised with respect to non-maintainability of M.A. No. 1668/2021. Therefore, now it is not open for the applicants to make a grievance with respect to non-maintainability of M.A. No. 1668/2021 and/or that no notice was issued.
4. Even otherwise, it is required to be noted that the present application is nothing but an afterthought and only with a view to get out the contempt proceedings initiated by the respondent by way of Contempt Petition No. 940/2021. It is to be noted that order dated 28.10.2021 was passed in the presence of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. Learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the applicants was heard. The present application to recall order dated 28.10.2021 has been preferred after a period of almost two and a half months, i.e., on 17.01.2022 and that too after this Court issued notice in the contempt proceedings and after the notice of contempt petition was served upon the applicants. Therefore, the present application is, as such, nothing but an afterthought and only with a view to get out the contempt proceedings, which have been initiated and filed as far back as on 18.11.2021 and notice was issued on 10.12.2021.
5. Even oth