State of Sikkim vs Jasbir Singh - 2022 Supreme(SC) 70

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 70

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT
State of Sikkim – Appellant
Versus
Jasbir Singh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Vivek Kohli, Adv. Gen. Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, Adv. Ms. Yeshi Rinchhen, Adv. Mr. Anand Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Narendra Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dey, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Shilpi Dey Auditya, Adv. Ms. Shreyasi Chakrabarty, Adv. Ms. Shehla Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Md. Anas Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

A. Facts ........................................................................................................................ 2

B. Submissions ............................................................................................................ 8

C. Analysis ................................................................................................................. 14

D. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 42

A. Facts

1. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Sikkim. While exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973¹[“CrPC”], the High Court has upheld the order of the Sessions Judge, Special Division-II, Sikkim, at Gangtok, directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim to furnish a written notice to the Commanding Officer of the unit of the respondent-accused and deliver

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 70

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANTState of Sikkim – AppellantVersusJasbir Singh – Respondent

Cases Referred (12)

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT
State of Sikkim – Appellant
Versus
Jasbir Singh – Respondent