D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT, VIKRAM NATH
Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited – Appellant
Versus
Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.
This judgment has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis:
A The Appeal
B Factual Background
C Submissions of counsel
D Whether the appellant is an operational creditor
D.1 Statutory Provisions
D.2 Legislative History
D.3 Judicial Precedent
D.4 Analysis
E Evidentiary value of respondent’s MOA
F Whether the application under Section 9 is barred by limitation
G Conclusion
A The Appeal
1. The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 20161[“IBC”] arises from a judgment and order dated 12 December 2019 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2[“NCLAT”] by which it reversed the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai3[“NCLT”] dated 6 December 2018.
2. By its judgment and order dated 6 December 2018, the NCLT admitted an application4[CP/708/(IB)/CB/2017] filed by the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited5[“Appellant”/“Operational Creditor”], under Section 9 of the IBC for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process6[“CIRP”] against the respondent, Hit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.