SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi)
L. NAGESWARA RAO, B.R. GAVAI, JJ.
Binay Kumar Dalei And Others - Appellants
Versus
State of Odisha And Others - Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 1627-1628 of 2022 (@ Diary No. 19961 of 2020)
Decided On : 02-03-2022
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 – Sections 36 and 36A – Stoppage of mining activity in vicinity of Elephant Corridor – According to Appellants and State Government there is no justification for stopping mining activity in area which does not fall within eco-sensitive zone – Dispute can be resolved by giving a direction to State Government to implement Comprehensive Wildlife Management Plan and complete process of declaration of traditional elephant corridor as conservation reserve as provided in Section 36A of Act – State of Odisha directed to implement Comprehensive Wildlife Management Plan as suggested by Standing Committee of NBWL before permitting any mining activity in eco-sensitive zone – State also directed to complete process of declaration of traditional elephant corridor as conservation reserve as per Section 36A of Act expeditiously – Mining operations of 97 quarries shall be permitted only thereafter. (Paras 14, 15 and 16)
Facts of the case:
Based on this report of the PCCF (HoFF) and being concerned with the stone quarries operating adjacent to elephant corridor, the NGT by an order dated 16.10.2019, directed the State Government to consider bringing the entire elephant corridor within the ambit of eco-sensitive zone. A further direction was given by NGT for implementation of the recommendations made by the PCFF (HoFF), Odisha. Out of the 97 stone quarries, 11 quarries were found to have ingressed into eco-sensitive zone. By its judgment dated 18.02.2020, the NGT directed the said 11 quarries to confine their activities outside the eco-sensitive zone. The process under Section 36 of the Act for declaration of the traditional elephant corridor as a conservation reserve was directed to be completed within three months. The Original Applications were disposed of with a direction that no mining activity shall be permitted within and in the vicinity of Similipal - Hadgarh - Kuldiha - Similipal Elephant Corridor. The Appellants who are lease holders and whose applications for impleadment were rejected by the NGT are aggrieved by the direction of stoppage of mining activity in the vicinity of elephant corridor.
Findings of Court:
Objection on behalf of Respondent No. 8 is only on the ground that the comprehensive wildlife management plan has not been implemented and that Section 36A of the Act has not been complied with.
Result : Civil Appeals disposed of with directions.
JUDGMENT :
L. Nageswara Rao, J.
Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment - Respondent No.8 herein, filed Original Application No. 02 of 2019 before the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter, 'the NGT') for a direction to the opposite parties therein to cancel the stone quarry leases granted pursuant to an advertisement dated 17.08.2017. Respondent No.8 also sought for a direction that no further lease shall be granted in the Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary and the eco-sensitive zone lined to it, as were notified in the notification dated 09.08.2017. It was further prayed that an enquiry should be conducted into the illegal and unlawful advertisement for long term leases in the wildlife sanctuary. During the pendency of the Original Application, the NGT vide orders dated 22.01.2019 and 12.03.2019 called for a report from the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Head of Forest Force (hereinafter 'PCCF (HoFF)') after conducting an inspection of the Eco-Sensitive Zone surrounding the Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary. Based on the report submitted by the PCCF (HoFF), the NGT by an order dated 16.10.2019 directed the State Government to take steps for bringing the entire corridor within the ambit of eco-sensitive zone and prohibit ingress into the eco-sensitive zone. Pursuant to this order of the NGT, Tehsildar Khaira directed the stoppage of operations of stone quarries in the Sarisua Hills. Aggrieved thereby, the Appellants, who were the lease holders of these stone quarries, filed an application for impleadment which was rejected by the NGT on 04.12.2019. On 18.02.2020, the NGT disposed of the Original Application by directing that no mining activity shall be permitted within and in the vicinity of Simplipal - Hadagarh - Kuldiha - Simplipal elephant corridor. The Tribunal ordered completion of the process under Section 36 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter, 'the Act') for declaration of conservation reserve in respect of the elephant corridor within a period of three months. The Appellants have filed this appeal assailing the correctness of the orders passed by the NGT.
2. By a notification dated 29.01.2001 issued by the Government of Odisha, Forest and Environment Department, area comprising of portions of Mayurbhanj, Balasore, Bhadrak and Keonjhar was declared as an elephant reserve - Mayubhanj (Similipal-Kuldiha-Hadgarh) Elephant Reserve, under the Central Scheme "Project Elephant". The total area of the elephant reserve was shown as 3213.81 sq. kms and the core area was 845 sq. kms of the existing Similipal Sanctuary. With respect to the taking up of non-forestry activities in wildlife habitats, the Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests (Wildlife Division) issued a guideline document on 15.02.2011. It was mentioned in the said document that environmental clearances for any project that falls within 10 kms boundary of the National Parks and Sanctuaries will be subject to the recommendations of the Standing Committee of National Board for Wildlife (hereinafter 'NBWL'). The user agency/project proponent has to seek prior permission from the Standing Committee of the NBWL before seeking environmental clearance in case the concerned project is located within the eco-sensitive zone or within 10 kms in absence of delineation of such a zone from the boundaries of National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries or is an Elephant Reserve/Tiger Reserve and/ or important corridors of wildlife movement.
3. In order to operate certain stone quarries near Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, the State of Odisha submitted a proposal to the Standing Committee of NBWL. In its 40th meeting held on 03.01.2017, the Standing Committee of NBWL considered the proposal of the State of Odisha involving operation of 97 Nos. of stone quarries at a distance of 2 kms from the boundary of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary. After due deliberations, the Standing Committee agreed to recommend the proposal subject to the implementation
Hospitality Association of Mudumalai v. In Defence of Environment and Animals & Ors.
Stoppage of mining activity in vicinity of Elephant Corridor – Dispute can be resolved by giving a direction to State Government to implement Comprehensive Wildlife Management Plan and complete proce....
Quarry permit without EC, pollution consents invalid near wildlife sanctuary ESZ; SEIAA must verify site before clearance.
Quarry permit without EC illegal if in ESZ; no violation if outside and no extraction started; direct consideration for clearance.
The court reinforced the prohibition of mining within one kilometer of wildlife sanctuaries, emphasizing adherence to environmental protection laws.
The court affirmed the right to interim relief for stone removal from a quarry operating outside the Eco-Sensitive Zone, balancing environmental regulations with the entitlement of the quarry owner.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the potential impact of quarrying on the surrounding ecosystem and wildlife, as well as the existence of an alternate remedy under Rule 36-C. The de....
Failure to comply with environmental clearance conditions can lead to the suspension of operations to safeguard ecological integrity.
Environmental Clearance upheld for sand mining outside notified ESZ (2 km) and 1.8 km from wildlife sanctuary boundary; corrected typographical errors in forest certificates do not invalidate process....
The insistence in Ext.P8 office memorandum for prior clearance from the Standing Committee for projects within 10 kilometres from National Parks was unsustainable in law as it did not follow the proc....
The main legal point established is that the authority's decision to prohibit quarrying operations, despite obtaining necessary clearances, was not legally justified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.