UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – Appellant
Versus
Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. Special leave to appeal granted. With consent of counsels, this appeal was heard finally. This appeal arises from an order1 [Dated 21.08.2019 in Income Tax Appeal No. 73/2019] of the Delhi High Court rejecting the appeal, by the present appellant (hereafter “the revenue”) and affirming the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which quashed the assessment order against the assessee (i.e. the respondent in this case).
2. The respondent-assessee company, Mahagun Realtors Private Limited (hereafter variously referred to as “MRPL” and “the amalgamating company” or the “transferor company”) was engaged in development of real estate and had executed one residential project under the name “Mahagun Maestro” located in Noida, Uttar Pradesh. MRPL amalgamated with Mahagun India Private Limited (herein after ‘MIPL’) by virtue of an order2 [In Company Petition No. 133/2007 c/w Company Application (M) No. 41/2007] of the High Court (dated 10.09.2007). In terms of the order and provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, the amalgamation was with effect
Saraswati Industrial Syndicate v. Commissioner of Income Tax Haryana, Himachal Pradesh
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Hukamchand Mohanlal
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Amarchand Shroff
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. James Anderson
Marshall Sons and Co. (India) Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer
Dalmia Power Limited and Others vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle, Trichy
McDowell and Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka Central
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.