SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 500

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Bela. M. Trivedi, JJ.
Manoj & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 248-250 of 2015
Decided On : 20-05-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Ms. Anjana Prakash, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shri Singh, Adv. Ms. Shivani Misra, Adv. Ms. Shreya Rastogi, Adv Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, AOR Mr. Kaustubh Anshuraj, AOR Ms. Sridevi Panikkar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AAG(MP) Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Mr. Karan Vishnoi, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Adv. Ms. Saumya Kapoor, Adv. Himanshi Goel, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Adv.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 397, 449, and Arms Act - Death sentence imposed on three accused for triple murder during a robbery - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence including fingerprints, ballistic reports, and witness depositions - High Court affirmed trial court’s decision, emphasizing brutality of the crime. (Paras 1-229)

(B) Legal principles on death penalty - Rarest of rare doctrine must consider both the nature of the crime and the offender’s ability to reform - Mitigating circumstances such as youth and good jail conduct are crucial. (Paras 181-220)

(C) Circumstantial evidence - Five golden principles must be established to affirm guilt - Guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, leaving no reasonable alternative hypothesis. (Paras 150-152)

Table of Content
1. establishment of initial facts and crime scene evidence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. judicial findings confirming trial court verdict. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. arguments contesting evidence against the accused. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16)
4. assessment of evidence and its sufficiency. (Para 51 , 68 , 82)
5. final sentencing considerations and decision. (Para 224 , 225 , 227)

JUDGMENT :

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

1. The present judgment will dispose of three appeals1[Criminal Appeal No. 248-250/2015] preferred by three accused persons. They were convicted under Section 302 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) (3 counts) imposed with death penalty by the judgment and orders of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Indore2[Dated 13.12.2013 passed in Sessions Case No. 536/2011]. This was confirmed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore3[Dated 29.09.2014 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 3/2014, 266/2014 & Criminal Reference No. 04/2013].

2. The appellants (Manoj, Rahul @ Govind and Neha Verma, hereafter referred by their names) were convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC (three counts) for committing the murder, during the course of robbery, of Megha Deshpande, Ashlesha Deshpande and Smt. Rohini Phadke on 19.06.2011. All three appellants were sentenced to capital punishment with fine of Rs.1000/- on each count, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo 6 months additional rigorous imprisonment (RI) on each count. Under Section 397 IPC, they were sentenced to undergo 10 years RI with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine, 6 months additional RI. Under Section 449 IPC, they were sentenced to undergo 10 years RI with fine of Rs.1000/-, and in default of payment of fine, 6 months additional RI. Manoj and Rahul @ Govind were also convicted for offence punishable under Section 2 5 (1-B) (B) of the ARMS ACT and sentenced to undergo 1 year RI with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine, 6 months additional RI. Rahul was also convicted under Section 2 7 of the ARMS ACT and sentenced to undergo 3 years RI with fine of Rs.3000/- and in default of payment of fine, 6 months additional RI.

Facts

3. The facts are that PW-1 Niranjan Deshpande rented a part of House no. 24 Shrinagar Main from its landlord PW-5 Vishal Pandey, few days before the date of incident i.e., 19.06.2011. Niranjan’s wife Megha, daughter Ashlesha and mother-in-law Smt. Rohini Phadke were at those premises, residing there. In the evening of that day another tenant PW-2 Dipti Kapil who lived on the same floor told PW-5 Vishal Pandey that Niranjan’s flat was bolted from the outside and reported seeing patches of blood on the door. On receiving this information, the landlord went to enquire. When no one opened the door, he looked through the open window and saw the dead bodies of the deceased persons lying near the bedroom door and blood was on the floor. He called his neighbour PW-9 Mahesh Parmar and Mukesh on the spot, before telephoning PW-1 Niranjan Deshpande to reach there immediately. PW-5 Vishal Pandey also lodged a first information report (FIR) at Police Station MIG Colony, Indore4[FIR No. 401/2011 dated 19.06.2011] which was recorded by PW-31 Inspector Mohan Singh Yadav (investigating officer “IO”). The FIR alleging that some unknown persons murdered the three deceased ladies with sharp weapons and fled the scene, registered offences punishable under Section 302 IPC and 25 ARMS ACT .

4. The police reached the premises and prepared a spot map of the crime scene. Several articles found at the spot were seized. It was later (on the next day) reported that Megha’s golden bangles and Mangalsutra, Rohini Phadke’s two gold bangles, and Ashlesha’s mobile phone, camera and ATM cards were missing. Investigation started and on 22.06.2011 at around 06:00 AM, PW-28 Vijay Chauhan while on patrolling duty, spotte

                                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                  1
                                                  2
                                                  3
                                                  4
                                                  5
                                                  6
                                                  7
                                                  8
                                                  9
                                                  10
                                                  11
                                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                  supreme today icon
                                                  logo-black

                                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                  qr

                                                  Scan Me!

                                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                  whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top