Back
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, MANOJ MISRA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Santosh @ Bhure – Appellant
Versus
State (G. N. C. T. ) Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. these two appeals preferred against (Para 1) |
| 2. two persons, namely, santosh (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. the trial court found— (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. the high court by placing reliance (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. in criminal appeal no.575 of 2011 (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. we have considered the rival submissions (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. in the instant case, the key circumstances (Para 27 , 28) |
| 8. insofar as tenancy of the apartment (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. in light of the discussion above (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86) |
| 10. consequently, criminal appeal no.575 (Para 87 , 88) |
JUDGMENT :
1. These two appeals preferred against the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court (for short “the High Court”) dated March 5, 2009 in two connected appeals i.e. Criminal Appeal Nos.682 of 2008 and 316 of 2008 are being decided by a common judgment.
3. Aggrieved by acquittal of Neeraj, State of Delhi has preferred Crimina
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
