Sabitri Samantaray vs State of Odisha

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 501

N.V.RAMANA, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI
Sabitri Samantaray – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Debesh Panda, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Anindita Pujari, AOR Mr. Siddhartha Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Azad Bansala,Adv. Ms. Prakriti Rastogi,Adv. Mr. Suvendu Suvasis Dash, AOR Ms. Swati Vaibhav,Adv.

JUDGMENT

KRISHNA MURARI, J.

Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3881 of 2017.

2. Present appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 08.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Odisha at Cuttack in Criminal Appeal No. 202 of 2015. The Appellants herein, namely Sabitri Samantaray and Bidyadhar Praharaj are wife and husband respectively. The two have been arrayed as accused no. 2 and accused no. 1 in FIR No. 120 of 2008. The Appellants herein along with their daughter (accused no. 3) had been charged with offences under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter referred to as ‘IPC’). Sessions Court Jajpur, in C.T. Case No. 76 of 2010 convicted accused no. 1 and 2 for offences under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC, whereby both the appellants were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-and further sentence of six months in case of default in payment of fine. Their daughter i.e. Accused No. 3 was convicted under Sections 302, 109 read with Section 34 IPC and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, and further sentence of six months in case of default i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 501

N.V.RAMANA, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLISabitri Samantaray – AppellantVersusState of Odisha – Respondent

N.V.RAMANA, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI
Sabitri Samantaray – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent