UDAY UMESH LALIT, HEMANT GUPTA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Mohammad Irfan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal appeal arising from multiple criminal cases. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of accused and trial court judgment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of investigations related to conspiracy. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. details of recoveries and accused involvement. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. reflection on conspiracy law and waging war. (Para 30 , 38 , 40) |
| 6. distinction between conspiracy and specific statutory provisions. (Para 42 , 43) |
| 7. final verdict on appeals and adjustments. (Para 44) |
JUDGMENT :
Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
1. Criminal Appeal Nos.201-202 of 2018 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos.7347-7348 of 2016); Criminal Appeal Nos.203-204 of 2018 (arising out of SLP (Crl) Nos.8246-8247 of 2016); Criminal Appeal Nos.205-207 of 2018 (arising out of SLP (Crl) Nos.8243-8245 of 2016) and Criminal Appeal Nos.208-209 of 2018 (arising out of SLP (Crl) No.138-139 of 2017) are filed by original Accused Nos.5, 6, 1 and 4 respectively, against the common judgment and final order dated 10.05.2016 passed by the High Court1[The High Court of Judicature of Karnataka at Bangalore] i
Ajay Aggarwal v. Union of India and Others
C. Muniappan & Ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Collector of Customs v. D. Bhoormall (1974) 2 SCC 544 : 1974 SCC(Cri) 784 [Para 32]
Kehar Singh and ors. vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Lal Singh v. State of Gujarat and Another
Nazir Khan and others v. State of Delhi
Radha Mohan Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.