UDAY UMESH LALIT, HEMANT GUPTA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Mohammad Irfan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal appeal arising from multiple criminal cases. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of accused and trial court judgment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of investigations related to conspiracy. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. details of recoveries and accused involvement. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. reflection on conspiracy law and waging war. (Para 30 , 38 , 40) |
| 6. distinction between conspiracy and specific statutory provisions. (Para 42 , 43) |
| 7. final verdict on appeals and adjustments. (Para 44) |
Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
2. In the instant case, eight persons were arrayed as Accused in the chargesheet but A-8 was shown to be absconding. A-1 to A-7, namely, Mohamed Razhur Rehman @ Abdul Rehman, Afsar Pasha @ Basheeruddin, Mehboob Ibrahim Sab Chopdar, Noorullah Khan @ Noorullah, Mohammad Irfan, Nazmuddin @ Munna, Chand Basha and Ahmed Basha respectively, were tried in Sessions Case No.539 of 2006 arising out of crime registered pursuant to FIR No.3/2006. By its judgment dated 17.12.2011 the Trial Court2[The Court of the City Fast Track (Sessions) Judge, Bangalore City (FTC II)
Ajay Aggarwal v. Union of India and Others
C. Muniappan & Ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Collector of Customs v. D. Bhoormall (1974) 2 SCC 544 : 1974 SCC(Cri) 784 [Para 32]
Kehar Singh and ors. vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Lal Singh v. State of Gujarat and Another
Nazir Khan and others v. State of Delhi
Radha Mohan Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.