SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 791

DINESH MAHESHWARI, VIKRAM NATH
Ajay Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Kumar Sharma – Respondent


ORDER :

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.

1. Having heard learned senior counsel for the appellant at sufficient length and having perused the material placed on record, we do not feel persuaded to entertain this appeal under Section 62 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20161[Hereinafter also referred to as “the Code’.] by one of the resolution applicants2[A consortium led by the appellant (comprising of a private limited company and the appellant himself) has been the resolution applicant.] in the corporate insolvency resolution process3[‘CIRP’, for short.] concerning the corporate debtor-B.B. Foods Pvt. Ltd.

2. The appellant seeks to question the judgment and order dated 13.01.2022 as passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi4[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the NCLAT’ or ‘the Appellate Tribunal’.] in Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 35 of 2022 whereby, the Appellate Tribunal declined to interfere in the order dated 13.12.2021 passed in I.A. No. 367 of 2021 in CP No.(IB)349/ALD/2018 by the National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad5[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the NCLT’ or ‘the Adjudicating Authority’.] by which, the Tribunal grant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top