SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 949

HEMANT GUPTA, VIKRAM NATH
Harbhajan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s) Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mrs. Kamaldeep Gulati, AOR Mr. Shyam Diwan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Grover, Sr. Adv. Dr. Hemant Gupta, Addl. AG Mr. Deepak Thukral, DAG Ms. Payal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Suresh Kumar Bhan, Adv. Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bansal Adv Mr. Gaurav Yadava Adv Ms Veena Bansal Adv Mr. Sourav Jindal Adv Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Vipin Singh Bansal, Adv. Ms. Amrita Verma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR Mr. Mayank Dahiya, adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Adv. Ms. Archna Yadav, Adv. Ms. Shivani Chawla, Adv. Mr. Rhythm Katyal, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Shukla, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Batra, AOR Mr. Tushar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AAG/AOR Ms. Bihu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Akshay C. Shrivastava, Adv. Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Adv. Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Ms. Indira B., Adv. Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv. Mr. C. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nahul Chengappa, Adv. Mr. Anuj Srinivas Udupa, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Kaveri Upadhyaya, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Madhumita Mishra, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR

Table of Content
1. challenge to the haryana sikh gurdwara act's creation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner challenges act on constitutional & rights grounds. (Para 3 , 4 , 11)
3. historical context & administrative provisions of the 1925 act. (Para 5 , 10 , 12)
4. arguments concerning legislative competence and rights. (Para 15 , 17 , 19)
5. court addresses rights under articles 25 and 26. (Para 25 , 48 , 55)
6. dismissal of writ petitions and civil appeal. (Para 57 , 58 , 61)

JUDGMENT :

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 735 OF 2014 AND WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1116 OF 2019

2. The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara Management Bill, 2014 (Bill No. 28-IIIA of 2014) provides that the Bill is an earnest effort to provide a legal procedure by which the Gurdwaras, owing to their origin and habitual use, regarded by the Haryana Sikhs as essentially pious places of worship, may be brought effectively and permanently under the exclusive control of the Sikhs of Haryana for their proper use, administration, control and financial management reforms to make it consistent with the religious views of the said community. It was pointed out that the Sikh Gurdwaras in the State are being gover

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top