Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU
Indian Pentecostal Church Of God (IPC), Represented By Its General Secretary, Presently Pr. Dr. Baby Varghese – Appellant
Versus
Binu V. George, S/o. Late V. George – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and background details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appellants' arguments on maintainability (Para 5 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 3. analysis of jurisdiction and applicability (Para 6 , 8 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. jurisdiction limitations under the constitution (Para 30 , 31 , 40) |
| 5. final decision on maintainability (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT :
S.MANU, J.
Order dated 28.7.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Pathanamthitta in I.A.No.4/2025 in O.P. (Society)No.30/2025 is under challenge in this appeal. Appellants are the respondents 1 and 2 in the I.A. Respondents 1 to 4 herein are the petitioners in the I.A. The remaining respondents are the respondents 3 to 5 in the I.A. respectively.
2. The I.A. was filed seeking temporary prohibitory injunction restraining the 2nd appellant from implementing and establishing the operation of IPC Malabar State, Kerala and also from forming further States by dividing the existing Kerala State Council. By the impugned order, the learned District Judge restrained the 2nd appellant herein from forming any ‘sub state within the Kerala State Council of Indian Pentecostal Church of God and also from proceeding with the functions of the IPC Malabar State Council
A State Legislature cannot confer jurisdiction on courts outside its territory, reaffirming that laws made by a State are confined within its territorial limits, as per Articles 245 and 246 of the Co....
Jurisdiction of District Council Courts is limited to parties belonging to the same district council, as per the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.
The jurisdiction of a High Court under Article 227 pertains only to the Debts Recovery Tribunal located within its territorial limits, not an appellate tribunal for matters originating outside its ju....
A High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226(2) requires that part of the cause of action arises within its territorial limits.
Legislature has no legislative competence to pass any resolution/law for change of capital or bifurcating or trifurcating the capital city Notified Master Plan cannot be modified suo motu.
The jurisdiction for challenging appellate tribunal orders lies in the High Court corresponding to the original tribunal's location, affirming the principle that appellate orders merge with original ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
