DINESH MAHESHWARI, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Aminuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Both these appeals are directed against the orders dated 26.08.2020 and 17.06.2020 as passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, respectively in Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 21839 of 2020 and 11840 of 2020, whereby the High Court has granted the concession of bail to the accused persons who are arrayed as respondent No. 2 in each of these appeals.
3. Perusal of the orders impugned make it explicit that the High Court had passed the said orders essentially with reference to the relief granted to the other co-accused persons, as could be noticed from the following submissions taken note of by the High Court in the order dated 26.08.2020:
“Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is general allegation against all the accused and co-accused Faim and Nasir having an identical role has been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6083 of 2020 and 11840 of 2020 vide orders dated 25.2.2020 and 17.6.2020 respectively.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.