M. R. SHAH, KRISHNA MURARI
Mariano Anto Bruno – Appellant
Versus
Inspector Of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KRISHNA MURARI, J.
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.01.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras (hereinafter referred to as “High Court”) in Criminal Appeal No. 166 of 2021 filed by the Appellants herein seeking to set aside the order of conviction passed by the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as “Trial Court”) in S.C No. 209 of 2016 under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”). The Appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 3 years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-each, in default of which to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 498A IPC and to undergo imprisonment for a period of 7 years with a fine of Rs. 25,000/-each in default of which to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months under Section 306 IPC. By impugned judgment, the High Court upheld the conviction of the Appellants for the offence under Sections 498A and 306 IPC.
2. Briefly, the facts relevant for the purpose of this ap
State of West Bengal v. Orilal Jaiswal and Anr.
Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal (2010) 1 SCC 707 [Para 15] – Referred
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab (2020) 10 SCC 200 [Para 15] – Referred.
Rajesh v. State of Haryana (2020) 15 SCC 359 [Para 15] – Referred.
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
S.S. Cheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan and Anr. (2010) 12 SCC 190 [Para 24] – Referred.
Ude Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana (2019) 17 SCC 301 [Paras 15 & 26] – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.