SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1083

ANIRUDDHA BOSE, VIKRAM NATH
Manik Bhattacharya – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Malik – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Parthiv K. Goswami, Sr. Adv. Ms. Diksha Rai, AOR Mr. Kumarpal Chopra, Adv. Mr. Gowtham Kumar, Adv. Ms. Jaikirti S. Jadeja, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim, AOR Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kabir Shankar Bose, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Surjendu Sankar Das, AOR Mr. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Ms. Annie Mittal, Adv. Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Adv. Ms. Mugdha Pande, Adv. Mr. Wedo Khalo, Adv. Ms. Anjani Kumar Rai, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet, Adv. Mr. Simarjeet Singh Sluja, Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Mishra, Adv. Mr. Nikhi Chandra Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Divik Mathur, Adv. Mr. Surjendur Sankar Das, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR Mr. Ravinder Singh, Adv. Ms. Raveesha Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shreyas Awasthi, Adv. Ms. Deeksha Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Adv. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shalini Kaul, AOR

ORDER :

1. These two applications have been taken out by the petitioner in connection with Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 16325-16326 of 2022. In these Special Leave Petitions, the petitioner has questioned legality of an order of a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta sustaining a series of orders passed by a Single Judge on 13th, 15th, 17th, 20th and 21st June 2022 in two Writ petitions, registered as 9979 of 2022 and 7097 of 2019. The controversy relates to allegations of illegalities in recruitment of primary school teachers through the Teachers Eligibility Test, 2014. In these orders several directions were given against the petitioner herein, including directing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to start interrogation of the petitioner and in the event the petitioner (and certain other persons) did not cooperate with the CBI was given the liberty to interrogate them after taking them into custody. This set of orders passed between 13th June 2022 and 21st June 2022 were carried in appeal by the petitioner as well as other authorities before a Division Bench of the High Court. The Division Bench, in substance, sustained these orders.

2. When the Petitions for


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top