S. ABDUL NAZEER, J. B. PARDIWALA
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Sandip Omprakash Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is at the instance of the State of Gujarat and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Gujarat dated 06.05.2021, in R/Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 3819 of 2021 by which the High Court ordered release of the respondent accused herein on bail in connection with the First Information Report being C.R. No. 11210015200100 of 2020 registered with the D.C.B. Police Station, Surat City, District Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(i) and (ii), 3(2) and 3(4) resply of the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 (for short, ‘the 2015 Act’).
3. The question that falls for our consideration is: whether the requirement of ‘continuing unlawful activity’, as defined under Section 2(1)(c) of the 2015 Act, necessarily requires a separate FIR to have been registered against any purported member of a gang after the promulgation of the 2015 Act i.e., after 01.12.2019? To put it in other words: whether an FIR under the 2015 Act (Special enactment) is maintainable in law or ca
Altaf Ismail Sheikh v. State of Maharashtra
Prafulla Uddhav Shende v. State of Maharashtra
State of Jharkhand and Others v. Ambay Cements and Another (2005) 1 SCC 368 – Relied [Para 47]
State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Shanti Lal Shah and Others (2008) 13 SCC 5 – Referred [Para 35]
State of Maharashtra v. Shiva alias Shivaji Ramaji Sonawane (2015) 14 SCC 272 – Approved [Para 7]
Tolaram Relumal and Another v. State of Bombay AIR 1954 SC 496 – Relied [Para 47]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.