SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1251

S. ABDUL NAZEER, J. B. PARDIWALA
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Sandip Omprakash Gupta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Mr. Kishan Dahiya, Adv. Ms. Monisha Handa, Adv. Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, adv. Mr. Anubhav Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is at the instance of the State of Gujarat and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Gujarat dated 06.05.2021, in R/Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 3819 of 2021 by which the High Court ordered release of the respondent accused herein on bail in connection with the First Information Report being C.R. No. 11210015200100 of 2020 registered with the D.C.B. Police Station, Surat City, District Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(i) and (ii), 3(2) and 3(4) resply of the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 (for short, ‘the 2015 Act’).

3. The question that falls for our consideration is: whether the requirement of ‘continuing unlawful activity’, as defined under Section 2(1)(c) of the 2015 Act, necessarily requires a separate FIR to have been registered against any purported member of a gang after the promulgation of the 2015 Act i.e., after 01.12.2019? To put it in other words: whether an FIR under the 2015 Act (Special enactment) is maintainable in law or ca


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top