A. S. BOPANNA, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
IFB AGRO Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
SICGIL India Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.
1. The short question for our consideration in this appeal relates to the scope of the rectificatory jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 20131 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘2013 Act’]. In this context, we are called upon to determine the appropriate forum for adjudication and determination of violations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover) Regulations, 19972 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘SEBI (SAST) Regulations’] and Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 19923 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘SEBI (PIT) Regulations’] framed under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 19924 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the SEBI Act’]. We have answered both the questions. On the first issue, following the decision of this Court in Ammonia Supplies
B.S.E Brokers’ Forum, Bombay & Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.
Jai Mahal Hotels (P) Ltd. v. Devraj Singh & Ors. (2016) 1 SCC 423 [Para 21] – Referred
Mannalal Khetan & Ors. v. Kedar Nath Khetan & Ors. (1977) 2 SCC 424 [Para 13] – Referred
Prakash Gupta v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. & Ors. v. SEBI & Anr.
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Ajay Agarwal
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Kishore R Ajmera
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Devkumarvaidya & Ors. (2009) 89 CLA 65 [Para 23] – Relied
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.