SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 463

A. N. RAY, JASWANT SINGH, M. H. BEG
Mannalal Khetan – Appellant
Versus
Kedar Nath Khetam – Respondent


Advocates:
J.John, R.S.Gae

Judgment

RAY, C.J.I. :- These four appeals by certificate raise two questions. First, whether the provisions of Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 are mandatory in regard to transfer of shares. Second, can a company having been served with notice of attachment of shares register transfer of shares in contravention of the order of attachment.

2. The appellant Mannalal Khetan and the respondents Kedar Nath Khetan and Durga Prasad Khetan are members belonging to two branches of the Khetan Family. The respondent Lakshmi Devi Sugar Mills Private Ltd. is a private company. It was incorporated on 7th April 1934 under the Indian Companies Act, 1913.

3. The Khetan family held shares in the respondent company and in two other companies Maheshwari Khetan Sugar Mills Private Ltd. The shares stood in the names of (1) M/s. Ganeshnarayan Onkarmal Khetan. (2) M/s. Sagarmal Hariram Khetan, (3) Sri Mannalal Khetan and (4) Sri Radhakrishna Khetan.

4. The members of the Khetan family did partnership business at various places. Civil Suit No. 337 of 1948 was filed in the Bombay High Court for dissolution of the partnership and for taking the accounts. On 3rd July 1953 the Official Receiver of the Bomba


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top