State of Haryana vs Niranjan Singh - 2023 Supreme(SC) 157

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 157

M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Singh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Ms. Abhivyakti Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Garg, Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan, AAG Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Avi Dhankar, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Aabhas Kshetarpal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Jha, AOR Ms. Priyambika Mk Jha, Adv. Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Mr. Shaurya Lamba, Adv. Ms. Bano Deswal, Adv. Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Ms. Abhivyakti Banerjee, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 09.04.2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 16346/2013, CWP No. 6729/2013 and CWP No. 10452/2014, by which, the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions and has set aside the action of the State in declining prayer of the original writ petitioners – original land owners for release of their respective acquired land(s) and consequently, has directed to release their respective acquired land(s) from acquisition, the State of Haryana and others have preferred the present appeals. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed in writ petition CWP No. 10452/2014, the beneficiaries of the acquisition have also preferred the present appeal arising out of Diary No. 37052/2022.

1.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that Civil Appeal No. 1347/2023 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 11842/2022 is concerned, the same is against the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 157

M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMARState of Haryana – AppellantVersusNiranjan Singh – Respondent

M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Singh – Respondent