SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 157

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, C.T. Ravikumar, JJ.
State of Haryana & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Niranjan Singh & Ors. Etc. - Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 1347-1349 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) Nos. 11842-11844/2022) With Civil Appeal No. 1351 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) No. 3980/2023) @ D. No. 37052/2022)
Decided On : 24-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Ms. Abhivyakti Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Garg, Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan, AAG Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Avi Dhankar, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Aabhas Kshetarpal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Jha, AOR Ms. Priyambika Mk Jha, Adv. Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Mr. Shaurya Lamba, Adv. Ms. Bano Deswal, Adv. Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Ms. Abhivyakti Banerjee, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
Release of acquired land – Part land cannot be released and/or with respect to part land, acquisition cannot be quashed.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 48 – Release of acquired land – Part land cannot be released and/or with respect to part land, acquisition cannot be quashed – In present case acquisition has been completed including acquiring land, passing award and payment of compensation and land in question is vested in State Government free from all encumbrances – State Government is guardian of public interest and public and public interest was required to be considered paramount interest rather than releasing lands at initial stage in favour of influential persons – State shall take care in future and must use lands acquired for the purpose for which same have been acquired otherwise object and purpose of acquiring land will be frustrated – When land in question is required by State for widening of road and when entire acquisition proceedings have been concluded, land was not required to be released – Impugned judgment and order passed by High Court quashed and set aside. (Paras 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5)

Facts of the case:

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 09.04.2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 16346/2013, CWP No. 6729/2013 and CWP No. 10452/2014, by which, Division Bench of High Court has allowed the said writ petitions and has set aside the action of the State in declining prayer of the original writ petitioners – original land owners for release of their respective acquired land(s) and consequently, has directed to release their respective acquired land(s) from acquisition, the State of Haryana and others have preferred the present appeals.

Findings of Court:

State was absolutely justified in not releasing the said land which as such is required for the widening of road. Under the circumstances, impugned judgment and order passed by High Court in CWP No. 6729/2013 deserves to be quashed and set aside.

Result : Civil Appeals Partly allowed.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 09.04.2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 16346/2013, CWP No. 6729/2013 and CWP No. 10452/2014, by which, the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions and has set aside the action of the State in declining prayer of the original writ petitioners – original land owners for release of their respective acquired land(s) and consequently, has directed to release their respective acquired land(s) from acquisition, the State of Haryana and others have preferred the present appeals. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed in writ petition CWP No. 10452/2014, the beneficiaries of the acquisition have also preferred the present appeal arising out of Diary No. 37052/2022.

1.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that Civil Appeal No. 1347/2023 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 11842/2022 is concerned, the same is against the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in CWP No. 6729/2013. Civil Appeal No. 1348/2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 11843/2022 is concerned, the same is against the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in CWP No. 16346/2013 and Civil Appeal No. 1349/2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 11844/2022 is concerned, the same is against the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in CWP No. 10452/2014.

2. For the sake of convenience, the facts of CWP No. 16346/2013 are considered which was also considered by the High Court as a lead matter.

FACTS IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.1348 /2023 ARISING OUT OF CWP NO. 16346/2013

2.1 That the State of Haryana issued a notification dated 21.04.1987 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), intending to acquire the land measuring 35.76 acres for the development and utilization of land as residential and commercial Sector 11, Kurukshetra and the same was followed with declaration/notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 20.04.1988. The objections were invited from all the concerned land owners. That thereafter, the award was pronounced by the Land Acquisition Collector on 12.04.1990 for the land measuring 34.61 acres only. That thereafter, a further notification was issued by the State of Haryana under Section 4 of the Act dated 11.02.2002 for acquiring the land measuring 126.30 acres for residential, commercial and institutional purposes in Sector 6 and 11, Kurukshetra. It appears that even before the issuance of notification under Section 6 of the Act, the land measuring 81.91 acres belonging to 43 land holders came to be released, details of which shall be considered hereinbelow. That thereafter, except the original writ petitioners of CWP No. 16346/2013, rest of the lands acquired belonging to the different land holders came to be released from acquisition either by the State Government or pursuant to the order(s) passed by the High Court in various writ petitions, the area of which amounts to 40.80 acres. The particulars of the land released with respect to the land acquired vide notification dated 21.04.1987 in tabular form are as under:

Sr.No.

Acquisition details of land acquired under L.A. Act, 1894

 Area in acres

1.

Section 4, 21.4.1987

46.49

2.

Land excluded u/s 5 A

10.83

3.

Section 6, 20.4.1988

35.66

4.

Land released between u/s 6 and award

1.05

5.

Award 12.04.1990

34.61

6.

Land released after award

26.83

7.

Balance Land Area [5(6+7)]

7.78

8.

CWPs pending u/s 24(2)

4.056

9.

CWPs pending other than u/s 24(2)

1.125

10.

CWPs dismissed/acquisition upheld

NA

11.

CWPs allowed/acquisition quashed by Hon’ble High Court where SLP filed or yet to be filed.

0.50

2.2 That thereafter


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top