SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1579

B. R. GAVAI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Md. Nijamuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, Advocate, Mr. Saipan Sheikh, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Kediya, Advocate, Mr. Shaz Khan, Advocate, For the Appellant.

ORDER

1. Permission to file petition is granted.

2. We are not inclined to entertain the present petition. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

3. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

4. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned judges of the High Court are requested to decide the appeal expeditiously and in any case, within a period of one year from today.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top