SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1583

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M. Sundresh, JJ.
Sonadhar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 529 of 2021
Decided On : 17-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Liz Mathew, Advocate, Mr. Navneet R., Advocate, Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate, Mr. Manish Kumar Vikkey, Advocate, Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Priyanshu Upadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Anilendra Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Sr. Advocate, Chhattisgarh Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Arora, Advocate, Odisha Mr. Shovan Mishra, Advocate, Ms. Bipasa Tripathy, Advocate, Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, Advocate, Karnataka Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, Advocate, Mr. Vishal Banshal, Advocate, Ms. Rajeshwari Shankar, Advocate, SCLSC Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocate, Ms. Prerna Dhall, Advocate, Mr. Nikhil Chandra Jaiswal, Advocate, Mr. Simarjeet Singh Saluja, Advocate, Ms. Khusboo Aggarwal, Advocate, Ms. Nidhi, Advocate, Mr. Sarthak Arora, Advocate, Kerala Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, Advocate, Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Advocate, Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Advocate, West Bangal Mr. Ashok Panda, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Soumitra G. Chaudhuri, Advocate, Ms. Vandana Tiwari, Advocate, Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Advocate, Bihar Mr. Saket Singh, Advocate, Ms. Somyashree, Advocate, Ms. Niranjana Singh, Advocate, Uttar Pradesh Mrs. Garima Prasad, Sr. Advocate, / AAG,Mr. Garvesh Kabra, Advocate, Chandigarh Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Advocate, Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, Andhra Pradesh Mr. Mahfooz A. Nazki, Advocate, Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Advocate, Mr. K. V. Girish Chowdary, Advocate, Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, Advocate, Ms. Eliza Bar, Advocate, Tamil Nadu Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Advocate, /AAG,Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., Advocate, Ms. Nupur Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahara, Advocate, Mr. Richa Vishwakarma, Advocate, Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Advocate, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate, Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Advocate, Ms. Limayinla Jamir, Advocate, Mr. Pashupati Nath Razdan, Advocate, Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Advocate, Mr. Shaddab Anwar, Advocate, Mr. Prakhar Srivastav, Advocate, Mr. Astik Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Ayushi Mittal, Advocate, Mr. Vipul Abhishek, Advocate, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate, Mr. G. S. Makker, AGA, for the Appearing Parties.

: Flexibility in dealing with unique or more heinous cases is essential in criminal proceedings.

Headnote:Compliance - Premature Release - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Section 432) - The court directed the Advisory Boards of all states to meet within two weeks and take remedial action based on the reports received. The judgment also discussed the possibility of an alternate route for cases with a maximum sentence of 7 years or less, emphasizing the need for flexibility in dealing with unique or more heinous cases.

Fact of the Case:

The court directed Advisory Boards of all states to meet within two weeks and take remedial action based on reports received. It also discussed the possibility of an alternate route for cases with a maximum sentence of 7 years or less.

Finding of the Court:

The court emphasized the need for flexibility in dealing with unique or more heinous cases and directed states to explore similar routes themselves.

Issues:

Compliance with premature release directions, exploring alternate routes for certain cases, willingness to accept infraction and no contest by life convicts eligible for remission.

Ratio Decidendi:

The court highlighted the importance of taking remedial action based on reports received and emphasized flexibility in dealing with unique or more heinous cases.

Final Decision:

The matter was listed for further proceedings on 14th September, 2022.

ORDER

COMPLIANCE OF PRE-MATURE RELEASE DIRECTIONS

1. Learned Amicus Curiae states that some of the inputs in reports have not been adequate and interaction is taking place with the State counsels to ensure that the information sought for by learned Amicus Curiae is made available to give a final report to this Court.

2. We are not inclined to give a long period of time and if the submission of the learned counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu is to be appreciated, Advisory Board is stated not to have made it. It thus appear to us that without our directions things do not move, which is not a happy state of affairs. We direct the Advisory Boards for all the States to meet within two weeks.

3. Learned Amicus Curiae also points out that in the reports of certain States problems have been identified and intimated. All States must take remedial action within the same period i.e. two weeks.

JAIL PETITIONS

4. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, learned Amicus curiae suggests that this also be taken up on 14th September, 2022.

POSSIBLE ALTERNATE ROUTE (Order dated 09.2.20221

5. We had dealt with possibility of an alternate route in cases where the maximum sentence is 7 years or less and the persons have either served out half the sentence or pending trial have already gone through half the sentence. In this behalf, Mr. Devansh A. Mohta, learned Amicus curiae has drawn our attention to the endeavor to take up the Chhattisgarh State for purposes of pilot project. He has filed an additional note today i.e. 17.8.2022 and a request has been made to the Principal Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs Department, Raipur for taking necessary steps under Section 432 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in respect of these 31 cases. The Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority (CSLSA) has also proposed a "Special Campaign" where efforts would be made to secure release of prisoners by adopting to compromise, plea-bargain or set off. Further they are proposing to request the Hon'ble Chief Justice of High Court of Chhattisgarh to issue circular to depute 2 to 3 Magistrates in every district/taluka for holding Court sitting in Jail Premises on every working Saturdays and dispose of cases in which the accused are willing to confess their guilt.

6. Learned Amicus curiae submits that by the next date i.e. 14th September, 2022 we may have a better appreciation of the efforts made by Chhattisgarh State. However, in our view, that does not preclude the other eight identified States i.e. Delhi, Gauhati, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal to explore the same route themselves and they will interact with the learned Amicus curiae for the steps to be taken in this behalf.

7. We may at this stage itself note that we have issued notice to all the States in a separate petition bearing SMW(Crl) No. 4/2021 where the larger issue would be examined keeping in mind the celebrations of 75 years of the Independence. We note here that plea bargaining in our statute only permits bargaining qua the sentence. The other aspect is plea-bargaining qua the nature of offence which is prevalent in many other countries and operated successfully. We are conscious this would require a legislative change but then on examination this Court can always make a suggestion for such a legislative change.

8. Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Sr. Adv. and Amicus Curiae in the matter has drawn our attention to the recognized practice in USA of 'Alford plea' and the 'nolo contendere plea'. In fact his submission is that such a course can be adopted even without any legislative action. The ascription of plea arose out of a judgment in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) by the U.S. Supreme Court, where an accused pleads guilty not because of an admission to the crime but on an admission that the prosecution has sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction, in order to secure a lesser sentence than may be awarded at trial. A 'nolo contendere plea' is a plea of no contest without admission

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top