SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1636

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HIMA KOHLI
O. Panneerselvam – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer Cum Sub Divisional Magistrate – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. P. Raja Lakshmi, Advocate, Mr. Goutham Shivshankar, Advocate, Mr. Adit Jayeshbhai Shah, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Advocate, Mr. K. Gowtham Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Shiva Krishnamurti, Advocate, Ms. Aakriti Priya, Advocate, Mrs. Lakshmi R. Rao, Advocate, Ms. Gauri Pasricha, Advocate, Mr. Prabhu V., Advocate, Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Advocate, /AAG, Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AoR. Ms. Nupur Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahara, Advocate, Ms. Richa Vishwakarma, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The notice under Section 145(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973[1] issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, South Division, Chennai dated 11 July 2022 relied upon an FIR in Crime No 190 of 2022 registered at E2 Royapettah Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 326 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 read with Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act 1992. The notice states that:

'It is seen from the contents of the FIR that it is a dispute between two factions of a political party with regard to possession of the building in question'.

[1] 'CrPC'

2. The FIR at Annexure P-4 ex facie indicates that there was no allegation indicating the existence of a dispute in relation to the building in question.

3. Section 145(1) of CrPC postulates the satisfaction of the Executive Magistrate from a report of a police officer or upon other information that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists, inter alia, 'concerning any land or water or the boundaries thereof, within his local jurisdiction'. The expression 'land' is defined to include buildings in Section 145(2). In the present case, the sole basi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top