Back
HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sanjesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. The sole arguments raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the claim was not filed within a period of one month or extending condonable period of one month.
2. We do not find any merit in the said arguments in view of Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short, 'the Act') which reads as under:-
"28. Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings, void.- [Every agreement,-
(a) by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under or in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary tribunals, or which limits the time within which he may thus enforce his rights; or
(b) which extinguishes the rights of any party thereto, or discharges any party thereto, from any liability, under or in respect of any contract on the expiry of a specified period so as to restrict any party from enforcing his rights, is void to the extent.]"
3. In view of the aforesaid Section, the condition of lodging claim within a period of one month, extendable by another one month is contrary to Section 28 of the Act and thus void.
4. In view of the said fact, we do not find any ground to interfere with the order passed by the High Court
Agreements limiting the time within which a party may enforce their rights under a contract are void as per Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
The period for deposit under a decree is calculated based on calendar months, not a fixed number of days, as per the General Clauses Act, 1897.
An application under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act can only be filed within three years from the date when the right to apply for rescission accrues. The concept of 'reasonable time' is cruci....
Point of Law : Contract and Specific Reliefs - Bank Guarantee - Validity of - A claim period of 12 months in the bank guarantee failing which clause shall be void under Section 28 of Contract Act.
Conditions restricting the timeframe for filing claims under an insurance scheme are void as per Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
The appeal was within the extended limitation period, and the Appellate Authority erred in dismissing it as time-barred without considering the merits.
The exclusion of the period from 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022 for the purposes of limitation as prescribed under any general or special laws in respect of all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, in....
The Supreme Court emphasized the need for the High Court to expedite the disposal of pending applications under Article 226(3) of the Constitution, reinforcing the principle of timeliness in legal pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
