Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hemant Gupta, V. Ramasubramanian, JJ.
Levaku Pedda Reddamma & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Gottumukkala Venkata Subbamma & Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 4096 of 2022 (@ SLP(C) No. 7452 of 2022)
Decided On : 17-05-2022
Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The trial Court and High Court erred in not allowing the defendants to produce additional documents in accordance with this rule. The court held that rules of procedure should not deny a party the right to file documents, even with some delay. The appeal was allowed and the defendants were permitted to file and prove the documents.
Fact of the Case:
Defendant's appeal against the order refusing to permit the production of additional documents
Finding of the Court:
Trial Court and High Court erred in not allowing the defendants to produce documents, leading to denial of justice
Ratio Decidendi: Rules of procedure should not deny a party the right to file documents, even with some delay
Result: Appeal allowed, defendants permitted to file and prove documents
ORDER
1. Issue notice.
2. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
3. Leave granted.
4. The defendant Nos.2 to 5 are in appeal aggrieved against the order passed by the High Court affirming the order passed by the trial Court refusing to permit the appellant to produce additional documents in terms of Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
5. We find that the trial Court as well as the High Court have gravely erred in law in not permitting the defendants to produce documents, the relevance of which can be examined by the trial Court on the basis of the evidence to be led, but to deprive a party to the suit not to file documents even if there is some delay will lead to denial of justice.
6. It is well settled that rules of procedure are hand-maid of justice and, therefore, even if there is some delay, the trial Court should have imposed some costs rather than to decline the production of the documents itself.
7. Consequently, the appeal is allowed. The orders passed by the trial Court and the High Court are set aside. The appellants - defendant Nos.2 to 5 are permitted to file the documents and to prove the same in accordance with law.
8. Mr. Nazki states that the plaintiffs-respondents should be permitted to lead additional evidence, if any, on the basis of the documents now produced by the defendants. We accept the request. The Plaintiff shall lead additional evidence, if any, before the defendants are given an opportunity to lead evidence to rebut the evidence produced by the plaintiff.
9. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Rules of procedure should not deny a party the right to file documents, even with some delay
The onus is on the party seeking leave to file additional documents to demonstrate valid and sufficient reasons for the delay, and the failure to furnish reasons explaining the delay in producing the....
The defendant can produce documents subsequently only in special and extenuating circumstances with the court's permission, and procedures cannot be implemented to cause injustice or prejudice to any....
The admissibility of a document is decided by the Court at the time of final hearing and not at the time when the document is produced, exhibited, and marked.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
