ORDER

1. The proceedings have been mentioned by Mr Vishnu Shankar Jain, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the original plaintiffs, namely, the first to fifth respondents in the proceedings before this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution.

2. Mr Jain states that the learned counsel who has been briefed to appear in these proceedings is indisposed today and, hence, is unable to remain present. He has requested the Court to take up the matter tomorrow.

3. Mr Huzefa A Ahmadi, learned senior counsel, states that there is no objection to the grant of adjournment on account of the personal indisposition of counsel, however, equally, it is necessary that the Trial Court which is continuing to hear the proceedings today may desist from doing so until this Court takes up the proceedings tomorrow.

4. Responding to the above submission, Mr Jain states that the proceedings before the Trial Court shall not be pressed any further hereafter until the Court takes up the matter tomorrow.

5. We accordingly direct the Trial Court to strictly act in terms of the above arrangement and to desist from taking up further proceedings in the suit in view of the consensus which has been arrived at be