SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ.
Karan @ Faitya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 572-573 of 2019
Decided On : 20-05-2022
Death Sentence - Confirmation of Death Sentence - Psychological Evaluation - Mitigating Circumstances - Access to Appellant - [PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION] - [CRIMINAL LAW] - [Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973] - The court directed the State to provide reports of all Probation Officers, the Jail Administration report on the appellant's activities in jail, and a psychological evaluation of the appellant. The court also allowed a mitigation investigator to have access to the appellant and submit a report to the court. These directions were aimed at assessing the character and behavior of the appellant and considering any mitigating circumstances before final disposal of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals arose from the confirmation of death sentence awarded to the appellant by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in a capital case. The execution of the death sentence was stayed, and the court received the original record. The appellant sought permission for a mitigation investigator to access him in jail for interviews and record review.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the State to provide various reports related to the appellant, including those of Probation Officers and the Jail Administration, and to conduct a psychological evaluation of the appellant. The court also allowed a mitigation investigator to access the appellant and submit a report to the court. The matter was listed for final disposal on a specified date.
Issues: Confirmation of death sentence, assessment of appellant's conduct and behavior, access to appellant for psychological evaluation and mitigation investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of assessing the character and behavior of the appellant and considering any mitigating circumstances before final disposal of the case. It directed the State to provide relevant reports and allowed a mitigation investigator to access the appellant for a comprehensive assessment.
Final Decision: The court directed the State to provide reports of all Probation Officers, the Jail Administration report on the appellant's activities in jail, and a psychological evaluation of the appellant. The court also allowed a mitigation investigator to have access to the appellant and submit a report to the court. The matter was listed for final disposal on a specified date.
ORDER
1. These appeals arise out of confirmation of death sentence awarded to the appellant by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Indore Bench) in Capital Case No.CRRFC4 of 2018 and Crl. Appeal 4379 of 2018.
2. The appeals were admitted on 01.04.2019 and the execution of death sentence of the petitioner was stayed. The original record has since then been received by the Registry of this Court.
3. We have passed certain directions in Manoj v. State of Madhya Pradesh [Crl. Appeal Nos.248-250 of 2015] and in some other death sentence matters which directions were passed after conclusion of the arguments on the issue of conviction. However, we are of the view that the assessment as regards conduct of the accused, if made before the final submissions are advanced, will go a long way in rendering assistance.
4. In series of death sentence cases, this Court has been passing certain directions so that psychological evaluation of the concerned convict can be ascertained. Further, access has also been granted to the learned counsel representing the appellant(s) so that any mitigating circumstances, if any, be brought on record, on behalf of the concerned appellant(s).
5. Since the appellant has been awarded death sentence, in our view, facets of the matter touching upon the character and behaviour of the appellant would be essential in order to have complete assessment in the matter.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant/convict has also filed I.A. No.73467 of 2022 seeking permission for a mitigation investigator to be allowed access to the appellant. Following prayers have been made in the application:
"a. Grant Ms. Baljeet Kaur permission to visit Central Jail, Indore and conduct in-person interviews with the Applicant Karan @ Fatiya.
b. Direct the Central Jail, Indore, that for the sake of confidentiality these interviews be conducted in a separate space without any prison staff official being at earshot distance of the Applicant.
c. Grant Ms. Baljeet Kaur permission to record the interviews conducted by means of an audio recorder in the separate interviewing space, or alternatively, grant permission to allow a person nominated by Ms. Baljeet Kaur to accompany her to take notes during the interview.
d. Direct the Central Jail, Indore to grant Ms. Baljeet Kaur access to all record pertaining to the Applicant including but not limited to medical record, jail conduct, work done or education pursued in Central Jail Indore, etc."
7. In order to have complete assistance in the matter, We direct as under:
1. The respondent-State shall place before us the Report(s) of all the Probation Officer(s) relating to the accused before the next date of hearing.
2. We direct that the Report of the Jail Administration about the nature of the work done by the appellant while in jail be placed before this Court before the next date of hearing.
3. The interest of justice also demands that we obtain a psychological evaluation of the appellant.
We, therefore, direct the Director, MGM Medical College, Indore, to constitute a suitable team for psychological evaluation of the accused/appellant in this case and send a report before the next date of hearing.
4. The Jail Authorities, Central Jail, Indore, where the appellant is presently lodged, shall render complete co-operation in facilitating access to and due evaluation of the appellant in all respects.
5. Ms. Baljeet Kaur, who is associated with Project 39- A of the National Law University, Delhi, is allowed to have access to the appellant, who is presently lodged in Central Jail, Indore, to submit an appropriate Report to this Court.
8. The Registry shall send due intimation to all the concerned authorities immediately.
9. Let the report be placed before this Court on or before the next date of hearing.
10. List this matter for final disposal on 15.09.2022.
The court emphasized the importance of assessing the character and behavior of the accused, obtaining psychological evaluations, and allowing access to mitigating circumstances before making a final ....
The court emphasized the importance of a psychological evaluation and the collection of relevant information for sentencing purposes.
(1) Death Sentence (Capital Punishment) – Mitigating and aggravating circumstances – Report pertaining to aggravating and mitigating circumstances shall, as a matter of course, be called for by trial....
The court established that the High Court has a duty to proactively gather and consider mitigating circumstances in death penalty cases, ensuring compliance with the procedural mandates of the Cr.P.C....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.