SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, Bela M. Trivedi, JJ.
Mohammad Azam Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5315 of 2022
Decided On : 27-05-2022
Bail Granting Conditions - High Court's Exceeded Parameters - Code of Criminal Procedure 1973
Fact of the Case:
The High Court granted bail to the petitioner based on age, medical condition, and previous bail history. However, the conditions imposed were deemed disproportionate and lacking reasonable nexus to securing the accused's presence and ensuring fair trial.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court's imposition of conditions for bail exceeded the settled parameters under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.
Issues: Excessive conditions for bail, lack of reasonable nexus, and exceeding parameters under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.
Ratio Decidendi: The conditions imposed for bail must have a reasonable nexus to securing the accused's presence and ensuring fair trial, and should not exceed the settled parameters under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.
Final Decision: The court issued notice returnable on a specified date and stayed certain directions contained in the impugned order of the High Court.
ORDER
1. In paragraph 36 of its impugned order dated 10 May 2022, the High Court opined that bail was being granted to the petitioner on the grounds of age and his medical condition apart from the fact that "in most of the cases in which the prosecution were initiated against him, he has been bailed out". However, prima facie, the conditions which have been imposed by the High Court for the grant of bail are disproportionate and have no reasonable nexus to the conditions which are required to be imposed to secure the presence of the accused and to ensure that the fairness of the trial is not impeded.
2. In paragraph 40 of the impugned order, the Single Judge has observed that "the present order in this bail application may sound like a decree of the civil court dealing and deciding the title over the property". Prima facie, the High Court, while imposing conditions for the grant of bail, has exceeded the settled parameters governing the exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.
3. Issue notice, returnable on 14 July 2022.
4. Till the next date of listing, the following directions contained in paragraph 39(1) of the impugned order of the High Court shall remain stayed:
"(i) As mentioned above, the applicant himself has distanced and delinked with the property in dispute though at present lying in the campus of University whose reference is given in paragraphs 8 (vii), 9, 10 and 11 of this judgment, the District Magistrate, Rampur being a representative of Custodian/Administrator of Evacuee/Enemy Property is directed to hold a measurement of the landed property in dispute which is center dispute of this issue admesuring area 13.842 hectares village Singhan Khera, Pargana and Tehsil-Sadar, District Rampur and thereafter raise a boundary wall and barbed wire around it and take the actual physical possession of the property in dispute on behalf of Administrator of Evacuee Property Mumbai latest by 30.6.2022.
In this exercise the the local Revenue authorities, University authorities would fully cooperate and shall not cause any hindrance or obstacle while carrying out aforesaid direction. Since the applicant Mohd. Azam Khan is already in jail for almost two and half years, he shall be released on interim bail during this exercise in aforesaid case crime by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lac and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. After completion of aforesaid exercise to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Rampur and after taking his final nod in the aforesaid drill, then only his interim bail would be converted into regular bail on the same terms and conditions and on the same bonds as furnished earlier. lt is expected that the applicant would also render his desired cooperation in completing this object during his release on interim bail. The Custodian Evacuee Property Mumbai is requested to hand over the property in dispute to some para military forces for their training purposes, as already done in the year 2014."
The conditions imposed for bail must have a reasonable nexus to securing the accused's presence and ensuring fair trial, and should not exceed the settled parameters under Section 439 of the Code of ....
Grant of bail – Any conditions imposed must be reasonable and directly related to this objective – While deciding bail application, it is not the jurisdiction of Court to decide civil disputes as bet....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail conditions should be relevant to the bail application, and courts should not impose extraneous conditions unrelated to the consideration ....
Grant of bail – Any condition that curtails fundamental rights must be justified by circumstances that necessitate such restriction – Condition of restricting appellant’s right to reside in same buil....
Bail conditions must be reasonable and not infringe upon the rights of the accused.
Prolonged incarceration with no prospect of the trial coming to an end makes a case for the grant of bail. Granting bail only for a limited duration is illegal and violates the right to liberty under....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.