SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1148

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.
Vishal Vijay Kalantri - Appellant
Versus
Shailen Shah (Resolution Professional Of Dighi Port Limited) & Others - Respondents
Civil Appeal No.2228 of 2021
Decided on : 06-08-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vivek Tankha, Sr. Adv., Mr. Manish Desai, Adv., Ms. Sudeshna Guha Roy, Adv., Ms. Deepti Mohan, Adv., Mr. Utsav Mukherjee, Adv., Ms. Smriti Churiwal, Adv., Mr. Jaivir Kant, Adv., Ms. Deepti Babel, Adv., Mr. Sudhanshu Kaushesh, Adv., Mr. K.P. Jayaram, Adv., Mr. Palav Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Pulkit Agarwal, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Gautam Ankhad, Adv., Mr. Nirav Shah, Adv., Mr. Ryan Dsouza, Adv., Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv., M/s. D.S.K. Legal, AOR, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Arshit Anand, Adv., Mr. Divyang G. Chandiramani, Adv., Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR

The court found no reason to interfere with the judgment under appeal.

Headnote:

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Appeal against NCLAT Judgment

Fact of the Case:

The appeal was filed under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the judgment dated 24.07.2020 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.466 of 2020.

Finding of the Court:

Having considered the facts and circumstances on record, especially paragraphs 9, 10 and 17 of the judgment under appeal, the court saw no reason to interfere and accordingly dismissed the civil appeal.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi:

Final Decision: The civil appeal was dismissed.

ORDER :

1. This is an appeal filed under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the judgment dated 24.07.2020 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.466 of 2020.

2. Having considered the facts and circumstances on record, especially paragraphs 9, 10 and 17 of the judgment under appeal, we see no reason to interfere.

3. The civil appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top