M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Saw Pipes Ltd. (Known as Jindal Saw Ltd – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Shah, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 04.08.2016 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Tax Appeal No. 1283/2006, by which, the Division Bench of the High Court has set aside the penalty and interest levied under sub-section (6) of Section 45 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1969), the State of Gujarat has preferred the present appeal.
2. The respondent company - assessee is engaged in the business of executing indivisible works of undertaking contract of coal tar and enamel coating on pipes. The respondent - assessee had opted for payment of lump-sum tax as provided under Section 55A of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. The respondent - assessee deposited tax at the rate of 2% on sales involved in the execution of works contract of coating of pipes by treating the same as civil works contract as prescribed in Entry-1 of the notification dated 18.10.1993 issued by the Government of Gujarat. The Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 30.03.2005 for assessment year
Guljag Industries Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer (2007) 7 SCC 269 – Referred [Para Para 3.10]
Commissioner of Central Excise
Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik Vs. Lata Nandlal Badwaik; (2014) 2 SCC 576 – Referred [Para Para 4.7]
Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 598 – Referred [Para Para 4.7]
State of M.P. Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals; (1997) 7 SCC 1 – Referred [Para Para 4.9]
Cement Marketing Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.